[ClusterLabs] PAF CentOS RPM

[Oyvind Albrigtsen]

On 22/02/22 11:59 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
>Hello,
>
>On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:27:16 +0000
>lejeczek via Users <users at clusterlabs.org> wrote:
>
>> ...
>> Perhaps as the author(s) you can chip in and/or help via comments to
>> rectify this:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>   Problem: package resource-agents-paf-4.9.0-7.el8.x86_64 requires
>
>PAF doesn't share the same release plans than the resource-agents project, but
>it seems RH included it in their build process as part as the resource-agents
>one, releasing it with the same version number:
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872754
>
>RH is delivering PAF since the RHSA-2021:4139 security fixes and update,
>in november 2021: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:4139
>
>I wasn't aware of this packaging and how it is built, neither of the repository
>it is delivered to.
>
>I am only aware of the RPM I am delivering on github, and the one provided by
>the PGDG repository: https://yum.postgresql.org/packages/
>
>> ...
>> How I understand that is that CentOS guys/community have PAF in
>> 'resilientstorage' repo.
>
>I have no idea why the PAF package is in this repo and not in the
>HighAvailability one where I suppose it should be host. Compare:
>
>* http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8-stream/HighAvailability/x86_64/os/Packages/
>* http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8-stream/ResilientStorage/x86_64/os/Packages/
>
>Ping Oyvind, maybe you have some input about this as the resource-agents
>package maintainer?
I dont know how it got excluded on CentOS Stream only, but I've
created a bz to fix it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056926


Oyvind Albrigtsen
>
>Regards,
>