[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: What a "high priority"?

[Ulrich Windl]

>>> Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com> schrieb am 29.03.2021 um 19:23 in
Nachricht
<ceabbfac6cf21b72288d101a050cccdff712f54e.camel at redhat.com>:
> Scores are in the range ‑1,000,000 to +1,000,000 (also known as
> "infinity").
> 
> Numerically higher scores are preferred in whatever the context is
> (e.g. higher stickiness means more sticky, higher colocation score
> means more likely to stay together, etc.).

So can you confirm that lower-priority resources are relocated (moved) first?

> 
> On Mon, 2021‑03‑29 at 13:05 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> The question may sound completely stupid, but I didn't find the
>> formal definition of a "high priority" in the pacemaker docs.
>> Many years ago I thought lower numbers are higher priorities, but
>> then I flipped the concept, thinking higher numbers are higher
>> priorities.
>> As it seems resource placement (i.e.: relocation) is don using lower
>> priorities first, I wonder whether ther is consent among the
>> developers what a "higher priority" is.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Ulrich
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Manage your subscription:
>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
>> 
>> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ 
>> 
> ‑‑ 
> Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Manage your subscription:
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> 
> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/