[ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs status

[Reid Wahl]

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 11:07 PM <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
>
> Hi Steffen,
> Hi Reid,
>
> I also checked the Centos source rpm and it seems to include a fix for the problem.
>
> As Steffen suggested, if you share your CIB settings, I might know something.
>
> If this issue is the same as the fix, the display will only be displayed on the DC node and will not affect the operation.

According to Steffen's description, the "pending" is displayed only on
node 1, while the DC is node 3. That's another thing that makes me
wonder if this is a distinct issue.

> The pending actions shown will remain for a long time, but will not have a negative impact on the cluster.
>
> Best Regards,
> Hideo Yamauchi.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Reid Wahl <nwahl at redhat.com>
> > To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed <users at clusterlabs.org>
> > Cc:
> > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 15:58
> > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs status
> >
> > It's supposedly fixed in that version.
> >   - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787749
> >   - https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4713471
> >
> > So you may be hitting a different issue (unless there's a bug in the
> > pcmk 1.1 backport of the fix).
> >
> > I may be a little bit out of my area of knowledge here, but can you
> > share the CIBs from nodes 1 and 3? Maybe Hideo, Klaus, or Ken has some
> > insight.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 10:53 PM Steffen Vinther Sørensen
> > <svinther at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>  Hi Hideo,
> >>
> >>  If the fix is not going to make it into the CentOS7 pacemaker version,
> >>  I guess the stable approach to take advantage of it is to build the
> >>  cluster on another OS than CentOS7 ? A little late for that in this
> >>  case though :)
> >>
> >>  Regards
> >>  Steffen
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 7:27 AM <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
> >>  >
> >>  > Hi Steffen,
> >>  >
> >>  > The fix pointed out by Reid is affecting it.
> >>  >
> >>  > Since the fencing action requested by the DC node exists only in the
> > DC node, such an event occurs.
> >>  > You will need to take advantage of the modified pacemaker to resolve
> > the issue.
> >>  >
> >>  > Best Regards,
> >>  > Hideo Yamauchi.
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > ----- Original Message -----
> >>  > > From: Reid Wahl <nwahl at redhat.com>
> >>  > > To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering
> > welcomed <users at clusterlabs.org>
> >>  > > Cc:
> >>  > > Date: 2021/1/7, Thu 15:07
> >>  > > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Pending Fencing Actions shown in pcs
> > status
> >>  > >
> >>  > > Hi, Steffen. Are your cluster nodes all running the same
> > Pacemaker
> >>  > > versions? This looks like Bug 5401[1], which is fixed by upstream
> >>  > > commit df71a07[2]. I'm a little bit confused about why it
> > only shows
> >>  > > up on one out of three nodes though.
> >>  > >
> >>  > > [1] https://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5401
> >>  > > [2] https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/df71a07
> >>  > >
> >>  > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:31 AM Steffen Vinther Sørensen
> >>  > > <svinther at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>  > >>
> >>  > >>  Hello
> >>  > >>
> >>  > >>  node 1 is showing this in 'pcs status'
> >>  > >>
> >>  > >>  Pending Fencing Actions:
> >>  > >>  * reboot of kvm03-node02.avigol-gcs.dk pending:
> > client=crmd.37819,
> >>  > >>  origin=kvm03-node03.avigol-gcs.dk
> >>  > >>
> >>  > >>  node 2 and node 3 outputs no such thing (node 3 is DC)
> >>  > >>
> >>  > >>  Google is not much help, how to investigate this further and
> > get rid
> >>  > >>  of such terrifying status message ?
> >>  > >>
> >>  > >>  Regards
> >>  > >>  Steffen
> >>  > >>  _______________________________________________
> >>  > >>  Manage your subscription:
> >>  > >>  https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>  > >>
> >>  > >>  ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
> >>  > >>
> >>  > >
> >>  > >
> >>  > > --
> >>  > > Regards,
> >>  > >
> >>  > > Reid Wahl, RHCA
> >>  > > Senior Software Maintenance Engineer, Red Hat
> >>  > > CEE - Platform Support Delivery - ClusterHA
> >>  > >
> >>  > > _______________________________________________
> >>  > > Manage your subscription:
> >>  > > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>  > >
> >>  > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
> >>  > >
> >>  >
> >>  > _______________________________________________
> >>  > Manage your subscription:
> >>  > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>  >
> >>  > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
> >>  _______________________________________________
> >>  Manage your subscription:
> >>  https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>
> >>  ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Reid Wahl, RHCA
> > Senior Software Maintenance Engineer, Red Hat
> > CEE - Platform Support Delivery - ClusterHA
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Manage your subscription:
> > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Manage your subscription:
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/



-- 
Regards,

Reid Wahl, RHCA
Senior Software Maintenance Engineer, Red Hat
CEE - Platform Support Delivery - ClusterHA