[ClusterLabs] Pacemaker Fail Master-Master State
İsmet BALAT
bcalbatros at gmail.com
Sun Feb 21 04:56:40 EST 2021
And this state can be. Master machine can down and anorher machine can be
new master. Then first machine can be online with master.Like in video.
This state, I cant fix because no internet. This machines will use a
offline project. All states have work successfully
On 21 Feb 2021 Sun at 12:45 İsmet BALAT <bcalbatros at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am testing aşk scenarios because I will use real machines with
> pacemaker. Scenarios;
>
> 1-
> node1 master
> node2 slave
> Shutting node1, then node2 become master
> Successfully
>
> 2-
> node1 slave
> node2 master
> Shutting node2, then node1 become master
> Successfully
>
> 3-
> node1 slave
> node2 slave
> One node become master after 60s
> Successfully
>
> 4-
> node1 master
> node2 master
> First machine fail, and not fix unlike send command cleanup
> Fail
>
> I haven’t got physical fencing device. But all machines must online for
> redundancy. So I guess we don’t use fencing. Because servers havent got
> connection for remote help and internet. They must fix their:)
>
>
>
> On 21 Feb 2021 Sun at 12:14 damiano giuliani <damianogiuliani87 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> My question is:
>> Why you are pausing one VM?there is any specific scope in that?you should
>> never have 2 master resources, pausing one vm could make unexpected
>> behaviours.
>> If you are testing failovers or simulated faults you must configure a
>> fencing mechanism.
>> Dont expect your cluster is working properly without it.
>>
>> On Sun, 21 Feb 2021, 07:29 İsmet BALAT, <bcalbatros at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, I am in +3utc and was sleeping. I will try first fix node, then
>>> start cluster. Thank you
>>>
>>> On 21 Feb 2021 Sun at 00:00 damiano giuliani <
>>> damianogiuliani87 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> resources configured in a master/slave mode
>>>> If you got 2 masters something is not working right. You should never
>>>> have 2 node in master.
>>>> Disable pacemaker and corosync services to autostart on both nodes
>>>> systemctl disable corosync
>>>> Systemctl disable pacemaker
>>>>
>>>> You can start the faulty node using pcs cli:
>>>> pcs cluster start
>>>>
>>>> You can start the whole cluster using
>>>> pcs cluster start --all
>>>>
>>>> First of all configure a fencing mechanism to make the cluster
>>>> consistent. Its mandatory.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021, 21:47 İsmet BALAT, <bcalbatros at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am not using fence. If I disable pacemaker,how node join cluster
>>>>> (for first example in video - master/slave changing)? So I need a check
>>>>> script for fault states :(
>>>>>
>>>>> And thank you for reply
>>>>>
>>>>> On 20 Feb 2021 Sat at 23:40 damiano giuliani <
>>>>> damianogiuliani87 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have you correcly configure a working fencing mechanism?without it
>>>>>> you cant rely on a safe and consistent environment.
>>>>>> My suggestion is to disable the autostart services (and so the
>>>>>> autojoin into the cluster) on both nodes.
>>>>>> if there is a fault you have to investigate before you rejoin the
>>>>>> old fault master node.
>>>>>> Pacemaker (and paf if u are using it) as far i know, doesnt support
>>>>>> the autoheal of the old master, so you should resync or pg_rewind eveythime
>>>>>> there is a fault.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021, 19:03 İsmet BALAT, <bcalbatros at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am using Pacemaker with Centos 8 and Postgresql 12. Failover
>>>>>>> master/slave states successfully run. But if all nodes are masters,
>>>>>>> pacemaker can't repair its unlikely send command 'pcs resources cleanup'.
>>>>>>> Wheras I set 60s in resource config. How can I fix it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> StackOverFlow link:
>>>>>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66292304/pacemaker-postgresql-master-master-state
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> İsmet BALAT
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Manage your subscription:
>>>>>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Manage your subscription:
>>>>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Manage your subscription:
>>>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>
>>>>> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Manage your subscription:
>>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Manage your subscription:
>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Manage your subscription:
>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20210221/7ec220b4/attachment.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list