[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Sub‑clusters / super‑clusters - working :)

[Ulrich Windl]

>>> Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar at gmail.com> schrieb am 06.08.2021 um 15:14 in
Nachricht
<CAA91j0V2zeZd75ZAY+2QvEPDBYAxucRSWDgC3OPgoPKxBHFi6g at mail.gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 3:47 PM Ulrich Windl
> <Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> >>> Antony Stone <Antony.Stone at ha.open.source.it> schrieb am 06.08.2021 um
>> 14:41 in
>> Nachricht <202108061441.59936.Antony.Stone at ha.open.source.it>:
>> ...
>> >       location pref_A GroupA rule ‑inf: site ne cityA
>> >       location pref_B GroupB rule ‑inf: site ne cityB
>>
>> I'm wondering whether the first is equivalentto
>> location pref_A GroupA rule inf: site eq cityA
>>
> 
> No, it is not. The original constraint prohibits running resources
> anywhere except cityA even if cityA is not available; your version
> allows it if cityA is not available.

?? If a resource must run on "cityA" and cityA is unavailable, then will it
run elsewhere?

> _______________________________________________
> Manage your subscription:
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> 
> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/