[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Sub‑clusters / super‑clusters?

Antony Stone Antony.Stone at ha.open.source.it
Thu Aug 5 04:51:37 EDT 2021

On Thursday 05 August 2021 at 07:48:37, Ulrich Windl wrote:

> Antony Stone schrieb am 04.08.2021 um 21:27:
> > 
> > As soon as I connect the clusters at city A and city B, and apply the
> > location contraints and weighting rules you have suggested:
> > 
> > 1. everything works, including the single resource at either city A or
> > city B, so long as both clusters are operational.
> > 
> > 2. as soon as one cluster fails (all three of its nodes nodes become
> > unavailable), then the other cluster stops running all its resources as
> > well. This is even with quorum=2.
> Have you ever tried to find out why this happens? (Talking about logs)

Not in detail, no, but just in case there's a chance of getting this working 
as suggested simply using location constraints, I shall look further.



This sentence contains exacly three erors.

                                                   Please reply to the list;
                                                         please *don't* CC me.

More information about the Users mailing list