[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Sub‑clusters / super‑clusters?

[Andrei Borzenkov]

On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 5:03 PM Antony Stone
<Antony.Stone at ha.open.source.it> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 04 August 2021 at 13:31:12, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 1:48 PM Antony Stone wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 03 August 2021 at 12:12:03, Strahil Nikolov via Users wrote:
> > > > Won't something like this work ? Each node in LA will have same score
> > > > of 5000, while other cities will be -5000.
> > > >
> > > > pcs constraint location DummyRes1 rule score=5000 city eq LA
> > > > pcs constraint location DummyRes1 rule score=-5000 city ne LA
> > > > stickiness -> 10000
> > >
> > > Thanks for the idea, but no difference.
> > >
> > > Basically, as soon as zero nodes in one city are available, all
> > > resources, including those running perfectly at the other city, stop.
> >
> > That is not what you originally said.
> >
> > You said you have 6 node cluster (3 + 3) and 2 nodes are not available.
>
> No, I don't think I said that?
>

"With the new setup, if two machines in city A fail, then _both_
clusters stop working"