[ClusterLabs] failure-timeout not working in corosync 2.0.1

[Andrei Borzenkov]

On 01.04.2021 00:21, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2021 at 23:11:50, Reid Wahl wrote:
> 
>> Maybe Pacemaker-1 was looser in its handling of resource meta attributes vs
>> operation meta attributes. Good question.
> 
> Returning to my suspicion that it's more likely me that simply did something 
> wrong, what command can I use to find out what pacemaker thinks my cluster.cib 
> file really means, so I can be sure it's been interpreted by pacemaker the same 
> way as I do?
> 

What you show is not CIB. What you show is input to some high level tool
that translates it into CIB.

By the look of it it is crmsh. So may be something changed in the way
crmsh parses its input. Or you used different input when it worked.

Showing actual CIB XML generated in each case would certainly be helpful.