[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] why is node fenced ?

Lentes, Bernd bernd.lentes at helmholtz-muenchen.de
Thu Jul 30 16:23:54 EDT 2020

----- Am 30. Jul 2020 um 9:28 schrieb Ulrich Windl Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de:

>>>> "Lentes, Bernd" <bernd.lentes at helmholtz-muenchen.de> schrieb am 29.07.2020
> um
> 17:26 in Nachricht
> <1894379294.27456141.1596036406000.JavaMail.zimbra at helmholtz-muenchen.de>:
>> Hi,
>> a few days ago one of my nodes was fenced and i don't know why, which is
>> something i really don't like.
>> What i did:
>> I put one node (ha-idg-1) in standby. The resources on it (most of all
>> virtual domains) were migrated to ha-idg-2,
>> except one domain (vm_nextcloud). On ha-idg-2 a mountpoint was missing the
>> xml of the domain points to.
>> Then the cluster tries to start vm_nextcloud on ha-idg-2 which of course
>> also failed.
>> Then ha-idg-1 was fenced.
> My guess is that ha-idg-1 was fenced because a failed migration from ha-idg-2
> is treated like a stop failure on ha-idg-2. Stop failures cause fencing. You
> should have tested your resource before going productive.

Migration failed at 16:59:34.
Node is fenced at 17:05:35. 6 minutes later.
The cluster needs 6 minutes to decide to fence the node ?
I don't believe that the failed migration is the cause for the fencing.


Helmholtz Zentrum München

Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen
Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH)
Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1
85764 Neuherberg
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzende: MinDir.in Prof. Dr. Veronika von Messling
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. med. Dr. h.c. Matthias Tschoep, Kerstin Guenther
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 6466
USt-IdNr: DE 129521671

More information about the Users mailing list