[ClusterLabs] qnetd and booth arbitrator running together in a 3rd geo site
rohitsaini111.forum at gmail.com
Tue Jul 14 06:19:07 EDT 2020
Also, " Keep in mind that neither qdevice nor booth is "replacement" for
Why not? qdevice/booth are handling the split-brain scenario, keeping one
master only even in case of local/geo network disjoints. Can you please
clarify more on this.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 3:40 PM Rohit Saini <rohitsaini111.forum at gmail.com>
> Thanks Honja. That's helpful.
> Let's say I don't use qnetd, can I achieve same with booth arbitrator?
> Booth arbitrator works for geo-clusters, can the same arbitrator be reused
> for local clusters as well?
> Is it even possible technically?
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 3:32 PM Jan Friesse <jfriesse at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Team,
>> > Can I execute corosync-qnetd and booth-arbitrator on the same VM in a
>> > different geo site? What's the recommendation? Will it have any
>> > in a production deployment?
>> There is no technical limitation. Both qnetd and booth are very
>> lightweight and work just fine with high latency links.
>> But I don't really have any real-life experiences with deployment where
>> both booth and qnetd are used. It should work, but I would recommend
>> proper testing - especially what happens when arbitrator node disappears.
>> > Due to my architecture limitation, I have only one arbitrator available
>> > which is on a 3rd site. To handle cluster split-brain errors, I am
>> > to use same arbitrator for local cluster as well.
>> > STONITH is not useful in my case as it is limited only to ILO and VIRT.
>> Keep in mind that neither qdevice nor booth is "replacement" for stonith.
>> > [image: image.png]
>> > Thanks,
>> > Rohit
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Manage your subscription:
>> > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Users