[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.4: shutdown locks
Ulrich Windl
Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de
Fri Feb 28 03:37:22 EST 2020
>>> Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com> schrieb am 27.02.2020 um 23:43 in Nachricht
<43512a11c2ddffbabeee11cf4cb509e4e5dc98ca.camel at redhat.com>:
[...]
>
>> 2. Resources/groups are stopped (target-role=stopped)
>> 3. Node exits the cluster cleanly when no resources are running any
>> more
>> 4. The node rejoins the cluster after the reboot
>> 5. A positive (on the rebooted node) & negative (ban on the rest of
>> the nodes) constraints are created for the marked in step 1
>> resources
>> 6. target-role is set back to started and the resources are back
>> and running
>> 7. When each resource group (or standalone resource) is back online
>> - the mark in step 1 is removed and any location
>> constraints (cli-ban & cli-prefer) are removed for the
>> resource/group.
>
> Exactly, that's effectively what happens.
May I ask how robust the mechanism will be?
For example if you do a "resource restart" there are two target roles (each made persistent): stopped and started. If the node performing the operation is fenced (we had that a few times). The resources may remain "stopped" until started manually again.
I see a similar issue with this mechanism.
[...]
More information about the Users
mailing list