[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: temporary loss of quorum when member starts to rejoin

Sherrard Burton sb-clusterlabs at allafrica.com
Wed Apr 8 08:07:54 EDT 2020

On 4/8/20 3:09 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>>> Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr at dalibo.com> schrieb am 07.04.2020 um 23:02 in
> Nachricht
> <20140_1586293370_5E8CEA7A_20140_452_1_20200407230230.1bc9b7b0 at firost>:
>> On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 14:13:35 -0400
>> Sherrard Burton <sb-clusterlabs at allafrica.com> wrote:
> [...]
>> But the best protection is to disable pacemaker on boot so an admin can
>> investigate the situation and join back the node safely.
> Actually before pacemaker we had a two-node cluster running without problems. Maybe pacemaker should fix two-node mode.
> Requiring manual intervention should be an absolute exception; instead the fenced node should integrate to the existing cluster, or form a new cluster. Both correctly, of course...

i concur completely. requiring manual intervention mostly defeats the 
purpose of running a cluster manager.

More information about the Users mailing list