[ClusterLabs] Fwd: Postgres pacemaker cluster failure
Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
jgdr at dalibo.com
Wed May 15 05:50:17 EDT 2019
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:59:49 +0300
Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar at gmail.com> wrote:
> 29.04.2019 18:05, Ken Gaillot пишет:
> >>> Why does not it check OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_notify?
> >> I was just not aware of this env variable. Sadly, it is not
> >> documented
> >> anywhere :(
> > It's not a Pacemaker-created value like the other notify variables --
> > all user-specified meta-attributes are passed that way. We do need to
> > document that.
> OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_notify is passed also when "notify" meta-attribute
> is *not* specified, as well as a couple of others. But not all possible
> attributes. And some OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_* variables that are passed do
> not correspond to any user settable and documented meta-attribute, like
Sorry guys, now I am confused.
Is it safe or not to use OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_notify? You both doesn't seem to
agree where it comes from. Is it only a non expected side effect or is it safe
and stable code path in Pacemaker we can rely on?
Does it worth a patch in pgsqlms RA?
More information about the Users