[ClusterLabs] Unexpected resource restart

Andrew Price anprice at redhat.com
Wed Jan 16 07:48:42 EST 2019

On 16/01/2019 12:26, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:16:04PM +0000, Andrew Price wrote:
>> The only thing that stands out to me with this config is the lack of
>> ordering constraint between dlm and lvmlockd. Not sure if that's the issue
>> though.
> They are both in the storage group so the order should be dlm than lockd?
>     Clone: storage-clone
>      Meta Attrs: interleave=true target-role=Started
>      Group: storage
>       Resource: dlm (class=ocf provider=pacemaker type=controld)
>       Resource: lockd (class=ocf provider=heartbeat type=lvmlockd)

Yes, you're right. I managed to confuse myself thinking about clones and 
groups together :)


More information about the Users mailing list