[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: why is node fenced ?

Ulrich Windl Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de
Wed Aug 14 02:25:56 EDT 2019


>>> "Lentes, Bernd" <bernd.lentes at helmholtz-muenchen.de> schrieb am 13.08.2019
um
16:03 in Nachricht
<854237493.2026097.1565705038122.JavaMail.zimbra at helmholtz-muenchen.de>:

> 
> ----- On Aug 13, 2019, at 3:14 PM, Ulrich Windl 
> Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de wrote:
> 
>> You said you booted the hosts sequentially. From the logs they were
starting 
> in
>> parallel.
>> 
> 
> No. last says:

But why do the eth interfaces on both nodes come up the same second
(2019-08-09T17:42:19)?

> ha-idg-1: 
> reboot   system boot  4.12.14-95.29-de Fri Aug  9 17:42 - 15:56 (3+22:14)
> 
> ha-idg-2:
> reboot   system boot  4.12.14-95.29-de Fri Aug  9 18:08 - 15:58 (3+21:49)
> root     pts/0        10.35.34.70      Fri Aug  9 17:24 - crash  (00:44)
> (unknown :0           :0               Fri Aug  9 17:24 - crash  (00:44)
> reboot   system boot  4.12.14-95.29-de Fri Aug  9 17:23 - 15:58 (3+22:34)
> 
>>> This is the initialization of the bond1 on ha‑idg‑1 during boot.
>>> 3 seconds later bond1 is fine:
>>> 
>>> 2019‑08‑09T17:42:19.299886+02:00 ha‑idg‑2 kernel: [ 1232.117470] tg3
>>> 0000:03:04.0 eth2: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full duplex
>>> 2019‑08‑09T17:42:19.299908+02:00 ha‑idg‑2 kernel: [ 1232.117482] tg3
>>> 0000:03:04.0 eth2: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX
>>> 2019‑08‑09T17:42:19.315756+02:00 ha‑idg‑2 kernel: [ 1232.131565] tg3
>>> 0000:03:04.1 eth3: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full duplex
>>> 2019‑08‑09T17:42:19.315767+02:00 ha‑idg‑2 kernel: [ 1232.131568] tg3
>>> 0000:03:04.1 eth3: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX
>>> 2019‑08‑09T17:42:19.351781+02:00 ha‑idg‑2 kernel: [ 1232.169386] bond1:
link
>> 
>>> status definitely up for interface eth2, 1000 Mbps full duplex
>>> 2019‑08‑09T17:42:19.351792+02:00 ha‑idg‑2 kernel: [ 1232.169390] bond1:
>> making
>>> interface eth2 the new active one
>>> 2019‑08‑09T17:42:19.352521+02:00 ha‑idg‑2 kernel: [ 1232.169473] bond1:
>> first
>>> active interface up!
>>> 2019‑08‑09T17:42:19.352532+02:00 ha‑idg‑2 kernel: [ 1232.169480] bond1:
link
>> 
>>> status definitely up for interface eth3, 1000 Mbps full duplex
>>> 
>>> also on ha‑idg‑1:
>>> 
>>> 2019‑08‑09T17:42:19.168035+02:00 ha‑idg‑1 kernel: [  110.164250] tg3
>>> 0000:02:00.3 eth3: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full duplex
>>> 2019‑08‑09T17:42:19.168050+02:00 ha‑idg‑1 kernel: [  110.164252] tg3
>>> 0000:02:00.3 eth3: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX
>>> 2019‑08‑09T17:42:19.168052+02:00 ha‑idg‑1 kernel: [  110.164254] tg3
>>> 0000:02:00.3 eth3: EEE is disabled
>>> 2019‑08‑09T17:42:19.172020+02:00 ha‑idg‑1 kernel: [  110.171378] tg3
>>> 0000:02:00.2 eth2: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full duplex
>>> 2019‑08‑09T17:42:19.172028+02:00 ha‑idg‑1 kernel: [  110.171380] tg3
>>> 0000:02:00.2 eth2: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX
>>> 2019‑08‑09T17:42:19.172029+02:00 ha‑idg‑1 kernel: [  110.171382] tg3
>>> 0000:02:00.2 eth2: EEE is disabled
>>>  ...
>>> 2019‑08‑09T17:42:19.244066+02:00 ha‑idg‑1 kernel: [  110.240310] bond1:
link
>> 
>>> status definitely up for interface eth2, 1000 Mbps full duplex
>>> 2019‑08‑09T17:42:19.244083+02:00 ha‑idg‑1 kernel: [  110.240311] bond1:
>> making
>>> interface eth2 the new active one
>>> 2019‑0809T17:42:19.244085+02:00 ha‑idg‑1 kernel: [  110.240353] bond1:
>> first
>>> active interface up!
>>> 2019‑08‑09T17:42:19.244087+02:00 ha‑idg‑1 kernel: [  110.240356] bond1:
link
>> 
>>> status definitely up for interface eth3, 1000 Mbps full duplex
>>> 
>>> And the cluster is started afterwards on ha‑idg‑1 at 17:43:04. I don't
find
>> 
>>> further entries for problems with bond1. So i think it's not related.
>>> Time is synchronized by ntp.
> 
> The two bonding devices (bond1) are connected directly (point-to-point).
> So if eth2 or eth3, the ones for the bonding, go online on one host the 
> other host
> sees it directly.
> 
> 
> Bernd
>  
> 
> Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen
> Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH)
> Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1
> 85764 Neuherberg
> www.helmholtz-muenchen.de 
> Aufsichtsratsvorsitzende: MinDir'in Prof. Dr. Veronika von Messling
> Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. med. Dr. h.c. Matthias Tschoep, Heinrich 
> Bassler, Kerstin Guenther
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 6466
> USt-IdNr: DE 129521671
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Manage your subscription:
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> 
> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ 





More information about the Users mailing list