[ClusterLabs] 答复: Could not start only one node in pacemaker
Andrei Borzenkov
arvidjaar at gmail.com
Wed May 2 01:05:35 EDT 2018
02.05.2018 07:28, 范国腾 пишет:
> Andrei,
>
> We set "pcs property set no-quorum-policy=freeze;" If we want to keep
> this "freeze" value, could you please tell what quorum parameter we
> should set?
>
There is no other parameter. Either you base your cluster on quorum or
you base your cluster on fencing. Attempt to mix them will give you the
result you have observed.
You cannot start resource management until you are aware of state of
other nodes so either starting node puts other nodes in defined state
(fencing) or you *MUST* stop and wait for (sufficient number of) other
nodes to appear, because doing anything else will clearly violate quorum
requirement. Quorum relies on the fact that out-of-quorum nodes will not
do anything.
> Thanks
>
>
> -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Users [mailto:users-bounces at clusterlabs.org] 代表
> Andrei Borzenkov 发送时间: 2018年5月2日 12:20 收件人: users at clusterlabs.org 主题:
> Re: [ClusterLabs] Could not start only one node in pacemaker
>
> 02.05.2018 05:52, 范国腾 пишет:
>> Hi, The cluster has three nodes: one is master and two are slave.
>> Now we run “pcs cluster stop --all” to stop all of the nodes. Then
>> we run “pcs cluster start” in the master node. We find it not able
>> to started. The cause is that the stonith resource could not be
>> started so all of the other resource could not be started.
>>
>> We test this case in two cluster system and the result is same:
>>
>> l If we start all of the three nodes, the stonith resource could
>> be started. If we stop one node after it starts, the stonith
>> resource could be migrated to another node and the cluster still
>> work.
>>
>> l If we start only one or only two nodes, the stonith resource
>> could not be started.
>>
>>
>> (1) We create the stonith resource using this method in one
>> system: pcs stonith create ipmi_node1 fence_ipmilan
>> ipaddr="192.168.100.202" login="ADMIN" passwd="ADMIN"
>> pcmk_host_list="node1" pcs stonith create ipmi_node2 fence_ipmilan
>> ipaddr="192.168.100.203" login="ADMIN" passwd="ADMIN"
>> pcmk_host_list="node2" pcs stonith create ipmi_node3 fence_ipmilan
>> ipaddr="192.168.100.204" login="ADMIN" passwd="ADMIN"
>> pcmk_host_list="node3"
>>
>>
>> (2) We create the stonith resource using this method in another
>> system:
>>
>> pcs stonith create scsi-stonith-device fence_scsi
>> devices=/dev/mapper/fence pcmk_monitor_action=metadata
>> pcmk_reboot_action=off pcmk_host_list="node1 node2 node3 node4"
>> meta provides=unfencing;
>>
>>
>> The log is in the attachment. What prevents the stonith resource to
>> be started if we only started part of the nodes?
>
> It says quite clearly
>
> May 1 22:02:09 node3 pengine[17997]: notice: Cannot fence unclean
> nodes until quorum is attained (or no-quorum-policy is set to ignore)
> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list:
> Users at clusterlabs.org
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started:
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs:
> http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list:
> Users at clusterlabs.org
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started:
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs:
> http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
More information about the Users
mailing list