[ClusterLabs] Colocation constraint for grouping all master-mode stateful resources with important stateless resources

[Alberto Mijares]

>>
>> It is possible. Check this thread
>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2017-November/006788.html
>>
>
> I do not see how it answers the question. It explains how to use other
> criteria than node name for colocating resources, but it does not change
> basic fact that colocating is asymmetrical. Actually this thread
> explicitly suggests "Pick one resource as your base resource that
> everything else should go along with".
>


To be honest, I didn't fully read the OP. I just read a fragment and
it looked to me like the grouping constraint could work.

Sorry, guys. Please ignore my post.

Best regards,


Alberto Mijares