[ClusterLabs] Upgrade corosync problem
Salvatore D'angelo
sasadangelo at gmail.com
Tue Jun 26 07:16:51 EDT 2018
libqb update to 1.0.3 but same issue.
I know corosync has also these dependencies nspr and nss3. I updated them using apt-get install, here the version installed:
libnspr4, libnspr4-dev 2:4.13.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1
libnss3, libnss3-dev, libnss3-nssb 2:3.28.4-0ubuntu0.14.04.3
but same problem.
I am working on Ubuntu 14.04 image and I know that packages could be quite old here. Are there new versions for these libraries?
Where I can download them? I tried to search on google but results where quite confusing.
> On 26 Jun 2018, at 12:27, Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 26/06/18 11:24, Salvatore D'angelo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have tried with:
>> 0.16.0.real-1ubuntu4
>> 0.16.0.real-1ubuntu5
>>
>> which version should I try?
>
>
> Hmm both of those are actually quite old! maybe a newer one?
>
> Chrissie
>
>>
>>> On 26 Jun 2018, at 12:03, Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie at redhat.com
>>> <mailto:ccaulfie at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26/06/18 11:00, Salvatore D'angelo wrote:
>>>> Consider that the container is the same when corosync 2.3.5 run.
>>>> If it is something related to the container probably the 2.4.4
>>>> introduced a feature that has an impact on container.
>>>> Should be something related to libqb according to the code.
>>>> Anyone can help?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Have you tried downgrading libqb to the previous version to see if it
>>> still happens?
>>>
>>> Chrissie
>>>
>>>>> On 26 Jun 2018, at 11:56, Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie at redhat.com
>>>>> <mailto:ccaulfie at redhat.com>
>>>>> <mailto:ccaulfie at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 26/06/18 10:35, Salvatore D'angelo wrote:
>>>>>> Sorry after the command:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> corosync-quorumtool -ps
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the error in log are still visible. Looking at the source code it seems
>>>>>> problem is at this line:
>>>>>> https://github.com/corosync/corosync/blob/master/tools/corosync-quorumtool.c
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (quorum_initialize(&q_handle, &q_callbacks, &q_type) != CS_OK) {
>>>>>> fprintf(stderr, "Cannot initialize QUORUM service\n");
>>>>>> q_handle = 0;
>>>>>> goto out;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (corosync_cfg_initialize(&c_handle, &c_callbacks) != CS_OK) {
>>>>>> fprintf(stderr, "Cannot initialise CFG service\n");
>>>>>> c_handle = 0;
>>>>>> goto out;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The quorum_initialize function is defined here:
>>>>>> https://github.com/corosync/corosync/blob/master/lib/quorum.c
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems interacts with libqb to allocate space on /dev/shm but
>>>>>> something fails. I tried to update the libqb with apt-get install
>>>>>> but no
>>>>>> success.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The same for second function:
>>>>>> https://github.com/corosync/corosync/blob/master/lib/cfg.c
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now I am not an expert of libqb. I have the
>>>>>> version 0.16.0.real-1ubuntu5.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The folder /dev/shm has 777 permission like other nodes with older
>>>>>> corosync and pacemaker that work fine. The only difference is that I
>>>>>> only see files created by root, no one created by hacluster like other
>>>>>> two nodes (probably because pacemaker didn’t start correctly).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the analysis I have done so far.
>>>>>> Any suggestion?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm. t seems very likely something to do with the way the container is
>>>>> set up then - and I know nothing about containers. Sorry :/
>>>>>
>>>>> Can anyone else help here?
>>>>>
>>>>> Chrissie
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 26 Jun 2018, at 11:03, Salvatore D'angelo
>>>>>>> <sasadangelo at gmail.com <mailto:sasadangelo at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> <mailto:sasadangelo at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> <mailto:sasadangelo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, sorry you’re right I could find it by myself.
>>>>>>> However, I did the following:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. Added the line you suggested to /etc/fstab
>>>>>>> 2. mount -o remount /dev/shm
>>>>>>> 3. Now I correctly see /dev/shm of 512M with df -h
>>>>>>> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>>>>>>> overlay 63G 11G 49G 19% /
>>>>>>> tmpfs 64M 4.0K 64M 1% /dev
>>>>>>> tmpfs 1000M 0 1000M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
>>>>>>> osxfs 466G 158G 305G 35% /Users
>>>>>>> /dev/sda1 63G 11G 49G 19% /etc/hosts
>>>>>>> *shm 512M 15M 498M 3% /dev/shm*
>>>>>>> tmpfs 1000M 0 1000M 0% /sys/firmware
>>>>>>> tmpfs 128M 0 128M 0% /tmp
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The errors in log went away. Consider that I remove the log file
>>>>>>> before start corosync so it does not contains lines of previous
>>>>>>> executions.
>>>>>>> <corosync.log>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But the command:
>>>>>>> corosync-quorumtool -ps
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> still give:
>>>>>>> Cannot initialize QUORUM service
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Consider that few minutes before it gave me the message:
>>>>>>> Cannot initialize CFG service
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I do not know the differences between CFG and QUORUM in this case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If I try to start pacemaker the service is OK but I see only pacemaker
>>>>>>> and the Transport does not work if I try to run a cam command.
>>>>>>> Any suggestion?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 26 Jun 2018, at 10:49, Christine Caulfield
>>>>>>>> <ccaulfie at redhat.com <mailto:ccaulfie at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>> <mailto:ccaulfie at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>> <mailto:ccaulfie at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 26/06/18 09:40, Salvatore D'angelo wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am reproducing only the required part for test. I think the
>>>>>>>>> original
>>>>>>>>> system has a larger shm. The problem is that I do not know
>>>>>>>>> exactly how
>>>>>>>>> to change it.
>>>>>>>>> I tried the following steps, but I have the impression I didn’t
>>>>>>>>> performed the right one:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. remove everything under /tmp
>>>>>>>>> 2. Added the following line to /etc/fstab
>>>>>>>>> tmpfs /tmp tmpfs
>>>>>>>>> defaults,nodev,nosuid,mode=1777,size=128M
>>>>>>>>> 0 0
>>>>>>>>> 3. mount /tmp
>>>>>>>>> 4. df -h
>>>>>>>>> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>>>>>>>>> overlay 63G 11G 49G 19% /
>>>>>>>>> tmpfs 64M 4.0K 64M 1% /dev
>>>>>>>>> tmpfs 1000M 0 1000M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
>>>>>>>>> osxfs 466G 158G 305G 35% /Users
>>>>>>>>> /dev/sda1 63G 11G 49G 19% /etc/hosts
>>>>>>>>> shm 64M 11M 54M 16% /dev/shm
>>>>>>>>> tmpfs 1000M 0 1000M 0% /sys/firmware
>>>>>>>>> *tmpfs 128M 0 128M 0% /tmp*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The errors are exactly the same.
>>>>>>>>> I have the impression that I changed the wrong parameter. Probably I
>>>>>>>>> have to change:
>>>>>>>>> shm 64M 11M 54M 16% /dev/shm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> but I do not know how to do that. Any suggestion?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> According to google, you just add a new line to /etc/fstab for
>>>>>>>> /dev/shm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults,size=512m 0 0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Chrissie
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 26 Jun 2018, at 09:48, Christine Caulfield
>>>>>>>>>> <ccaulfie at redhat.com <mailto:ccaulfie at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ccaulfie at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ccaulfie at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ccaulfie at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 25/06/18 20:41, Salvatore D'angelo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Let me add here one important detail. I use Docker for my test
>>>>>>>>>>> with 5
>>>>>>>>>>> containers deployed on my Mac.
>>>>>>>>>>> Basically the team that worked on this project installed the
>>>>>>>>>>> cluster
>>>>>>>>>>> on soft layer bare metal.
>>>>>>>>>>> The PostgreSQL cluster was hard to test and if a misconfiguration
>>>>>>>>>>> occurred recreate the cluster from scratch is not easy.
>>>>>>>>>>> Test it was a cumbersome if you consider that we access to the
>>>>>>>>>>> machines with a complex system hard to describe here.
>>>>>>>>>>> For this reason I ported the cluster on Docker for test purpose.
>>>>>>>>>>> I am
>>>>>>>>>>> not interested to have it working for months, I just need a
>>>>>>>>>>> proof of
>>>>>>>>>>> concept.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> When the migration works I’ll port everything on bare metal
>>>>>>>>>>> where the
>>>>>>>>>>> size of resources are ambundant.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Now I have enough RAM and disk space on my Mac so if you tell me
>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>> should be an acceptable size for several days of running it is ok
>>>>>>>>>>> for me.
>>>>>>>>>>> It is ok also have commands to clean the shm when required.
>>>>>>>>>>> I know I can find them on Google but if you can suggest me these
>>>>>>>>>>> info
>>>>>>>>>>> I’ll appreciate. I have OS knowledge to do that but I would
>>>>>>>>>>> like to
>>>>>>>>>>> avoid days of guesswork and try and error if possible.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would recommend at least 128MB of space on /dev/shm, 256MB if
>>>>>>>>>> you can
>>>>>>>>>> spare it. My 'standard' system uses 75MB under normal running
>>>>>>>>>> allowing
>>>>>>>>>> for one command-line query to run.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If I read this right then you're reproducing a bare-metal system in
>>>>>>>>>> containers now? so the original systems will have a default
>>>>>>>>>> /dev/shm
>>>>>>>>>> size which is probably much larger than your containers?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm just checking here that we don't have a regression in memory
>>>>>>>>>> usage
>>>>>>>>>> as Poki suggested.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Chrissie
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25 Jun 2018, at 21:18, Jan Pokorný <jpokorny at redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:jpokorny at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:jpokorny at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:jpokorny at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:jpokorny at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25/06/18 19:06 +0200, Salvatore D'angelo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reply. I scratched my cluster and created it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> again and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> then migrated as before. This time I uninstalled pacemaker,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> corosync, crmsh and resource agents with make uninstall
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> then I installed new packages. The problem is the same, when
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I launch:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> corosync-quorumtool -ps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I got: Cannot initialize QUORUM service
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here the log with debug enabled:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [18019] pg3 corosyncerror [QB ] couldn't create
>>>>>>>>>>>>> circular mmap
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on /dev/shm/qb-cfg-event-18020-18028-23-data
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [18019] pg3 corosyncerror [QB ]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> qb_rb_open:cfg-event-18020-18028-23: Resource temporarily
>>>>>>>>>>>>> unavailable (11)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [18019] pg3 corosyncdebug [QB ] Free'ing ringbuffer:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /dev/shm/qb-cfg-request-18020-18028-23-header
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [18019] pg3 corosyncdebug [QB ] Free'ing ringbuffer:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /dev/shm/qb-cfg-response-18020-18028-23-header
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [18019] pg3 corosyncerror [QB ] shm connection FAILED:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resource temporarily unavailable (11)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [18019] pg3 corosyncerror [QB ] Error in connection setup
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (18020-18028-23): Resource temporarily unavailable (11)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I tried to check /dev/shm and I am not sure these are the right
>>>>>>>>>>>>> commands, however:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> df -h /dev/shm
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shm 64M 16M 49M 24% /dev/shm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ls /dev/shm
>>>>>>>>>>>>> qb-cmap-request-18020-18036-25-data qb-corosync-blackbox-data
>>>>>>>>>>>>> qb-quorum-request-18020-18095-32-data
>>>>>>>>>>>>> qb-cmap-request-18020-18036-25-header
>>>>>>>>>>>>> qb-corosync-blackbox-header
>>>>>>>>>>>>> qb-quorum-request-18020-18095-32-header
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is 64 Mb enough for /dev/shm. If no, why it worked with previous
>>>>>>>>>>>>> corosync release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> For a start, can you try configuring corosync with
>>>>>>>>>>>> --enable-small-memory-footprint switch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hard to say why the space provisioned to /dev/shm is the direct
>>>>>>>>>>>> opposite of generous (per today's standards), but may be the
>>>>>>>>>>>> result
>>>>>>>>>>>> of automatic HW adaptation, and if RAM is so scarce in your case,
>>>>>>>>>>>> the above build-time toggle might help.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, then exponentially increasing size of /dev/shm space is
>>>>>>>>>>>> likely your best bet (I don't recommended fiddling with
>>>>>>>>>>>> mlockall()
>>>>>>>>>>>> and similar measures in corosync).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, feel free to raise a regression if you have a
>>>>>>>>>>>> reproducible
>>>>>>>>>>>> comparison between two corosync (plus possibly different
>>>>>>>>>>>> libraries
>>>>>>>>>>>> like libqb) versions, one that works and one that won't, in
>>>>>>>>>>>> reproducible conditions (like this small /dev/shm, VM image,
>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jan (Poki)
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.clusterlabs.org/>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.clusterlabs.org/>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Getting
>>>>>>>>>>>> started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/> <http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.clusterlabs.org/>
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.clusterlabs.org/> <http://www.clusterlabs.org/>
>>>>>>>>>>> Getting
>>>>>>>>>>> started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org <http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/>
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/> <http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.clusterlabs.org/>
>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.clusterlabs.org/> <http://www.clusterlabs.org/>
>>>>>>>>>> Getting
>>>>>>>>>> started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>>>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org <http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/>
>>>>>>>>>> <http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/> <http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.clusterlabs.org/>
>>>>>>>>> Getting
>>>>>>>>> started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org <http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>>>>> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>>>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>>> <http://www.clusterlabs.org/>
>>>>>>>> Getting started:
>>>>>>>> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org <http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
>>>>>> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>> Getting started:
>>>>>> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
>>>>> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org> <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>
>>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180626/ebe1ed5c/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list