[ClusterLabs] Antwort: Re: corosync/dlm fencing?

Thu Jul 19 15:25:57 UTC 2018

"Users" <users-bounces at clusterlabs.org> schrieb am 18.07.2018 15:46:09:

> Von: Jan Pokorný <jpokorny at redhat.com>
> An: users at clusterlabs.org
> Datum: 18.07.2018 15:46
> Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync/dlm fencing?
> Gesendet von: "Users" <users-bounces at clusterlabs.org>
> 
> Just minor clarifications (without changing the validity) below:
> 
> On 17/07/18 21:28 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> > 
> > On 16/07/18 11:44 +0200, Philipp Achmüller wrote:
> >> Unfortunatly it is not obvious for me - the "grep fence" is attached
> >> in my original message.
> > 
> > Sifting your logs a bit:
> > 
> >> -------------------
> >> Node: siteb-2 (DC):
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:23.282153+02:00 siteb-2 pengine[189259]: 
> notice: Move stonith-sbd#011(Started sitea-1 -> siteb-1)
> >> [...]
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:23.284575+02:00 siteb-2 crmd[189260]:   notice: 
> Initiating stop operation stonith-sbd_stop_0 on sitea-1
> >> [...]
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:23.288254+02:00 siteb-2 crmd[189260]:   notice: 
> Initiating start operation stonith-sbd_start_0 on siteb-1
> >> [...]
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:38.414440+02:00 siteb-2 corosync[189245]: 
> [TOTEM ] A processor failed, forming new configuration.
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.080141+02:00 siteb-2 corosync[189245]: 
> [TOTEM ] A new membership (192.168.121.55:2012) was formed. Members 
left: 2
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.080537+02:00 siteb-2 corosync[189245]: 
> [TOTEM ] Failed to receive the leave message. failed: 2
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.083415+02:00 siteb-2 attrd[189258]:   notice:
> Node siteb-1 state is now lost
> >> [...]
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.084054+02:00 siteb-2 crmd[189260]:  warning: 
> No reason to expect node 2 to be down
> >> [...]
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.084409+02:00 siteb-2 corosync[189245]: 
> [QUORUM] Members[3]: 1 3 4
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.084492+02:00 siteb-2 corosync[189245]: 
> [MAIN  ] Completed service synchronization, ready to provide service.
> >> [...]
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.085210+02:00 siteb-2 kernel: [80872.012486] 
> dlm: closing connection to node 2
> >> [...]
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:53.098683+02:00 siteb-2 pengine[189259]: 
> warning: Scheduling Node siteb-1 for STONITH
> > 
> >> -------------------
> >> Node sitea-1:
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:38.413748+02:00 sitea-1 corosync[6661]:   [TOTEM
> ] A processor failed, forming new configuration.
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.079905+02:00 sitea-1 corosync[6661]:   [TOTEM
> ] A new membership (192.168.121.55:2012) was formed. Members left: 2
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.080306+02:00 sitea-1 corosync[6661]:   [TOTEM
> ] Failed to receive the leave message. failed: 2
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.082619+02:00 sitea-1 cib[9021]:   notice: 
> Node siteb-1 state is now lost
> >> [...]
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.083429+02:00 sitea-1 corosync[6661]: 
> [QUORUM] Members[3]: 1 3 4
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.083521+02:00 sitea-1 corosync[6661]:   [MAIN 
> ] Completed service synchronization, ready to provide service.
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.083606+02:00 sitea-1 crmd[9031]:   notice: 
> Node siteb-1 state is now lost
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.084290+02:00 sitea-1 dlm_controld[73416]: 
> 59514 fence request 2 pid 171087 nodedown time 1530169372 fence_all 
> dlm_stonith
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.085446+02:00 sitea-1 kernel: [59508.568940] 
> dlm: closing connection to node 2
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.109393+02:00 sitea-1 dlm_stonith: 
> stonith_api_time: Found 0 entries for 2/(null): 0 in progress, 0 
completed
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.110167+02:00 sitea-1 stonith-ng[9022]: 
> notice: Client stonith-api.171087.d3c59fc2 wants to fence (reboot) 
> '2' with device '(any)'
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.113257+02:00 sitea-1 stonith-ng[9022]: 
> notice: Requesting peer fencing (reboot) of siteb-1
> >> 2018-06-28T09:03:29.096714+02:00 sitea-1 stonith-ng[9022]: 
> notice: Operation reboot of siteb-1 by sitea-2 for stonith-api.
> 171087 at sitea-1.9fe08723: OK
> >> 2018-06-28T09:03:29.097152+02:00 sitea-1 stonith-api[171087]: 
> stonith_api_kick: Node 2/(null) kicked: reboot
> >> 2018-06-28T09:03:29.097426+02:00 sitea-1 crmd[9031]:   notice: 
> Peer lnx0361b was terminated (reboot) by sitea-2 on behalf of 
> stonith-api.171087: OK
> >> 2018-06-28T09:03:30.098657+02:00 sitea-1 dlm_controld[73416]: 
> 59552 fence result 2 pid 171087 result 0 exit status
> >> 2018-06-28T09:03:30.099730+02:00 sitea-1 dlm_controld[73416]: 
> 59552 fence status 2 receive 0 from 1 walltime 1530169410 local 59552
> > 
> >> -------------------
> >> Node sitea-2:
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:38.412808+02:00 sitea-2 corosync[6570]:   [TOTEM
> ] A processor failed, forming new configuration.
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.078249+02:00 sitea-2 corosync[6570]:   [TOTEM
> ] A new membership (192.168.121.55:2012) was formed. Members left: 2
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.078359+02:00 sitea-2 corosync[6570]:   [TOTEM
> ] Failed to receive the leave message. failed: 2
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.081949+02:00 sitea-2 cib[9655]:   notice: 
> Node siteb-1 state is now lost
> >> [...]
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.082653+02:00 sitea-2 corosync[6570]: 
> [QUORUM] Members[3]: 1 3 4
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.082739+02:00 sitea-2 corosync[6570]:   [MAIN 
> ] Completed service synchronization, ready to provide service.
> >> [...]
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.495697+02:00 sitea-2 stonith-ng[9656]: 
> notice: stonith-sbd can fence (reboot) siteb-1: dynamic-list
> >> 2018-06-28T09:02:52.495902+02:00 sitea-2 stonith-ng[9656]: 
> notice: Delaying reboot on stonith-sbd for 25358ms (timeout=300s)
> >> 2018-06-28T09:03:29.093957+02:00 sitea-2 stonith-ng[9656]: 
> notice: Operation 'reboot' [231293] (call 2 from stonith-api.171087)
> for host 'siteb-1' with device 'stonith-sbd' returned: 0 (OK)
> >> 2018-06-28T09:03:29.096254+02:00 sitea-2 stonith-ng[9656]: 
> notice: Operation reboot of siteb-1 by sitea-2 for stonith-api.
> 171087 at sitea-1.9fe08723: OK
> >> 2018-06-28T09:03:29.096769+02:00 sitea-2 crmd[9660]:   notice: 
> Peer siteb-1 was terminated (reboot) by sitea-2 on behalf of 
> stonith-api.171087: OK
> > 
> >> -------------------
> >> Node sideb-1 has no entries during this timeframe
> >> 
> >> during standby corosync should be up/running - so may the "Failed to 
> >> receive the leave message" will be a Problem?
> > 
> > True, it should normally stay running, and that's actually the problem
> > here and you just seem to be confusing consequence with consequence:
> 
> "consequence with the cause", apparently
> 
> > 
> > - first: the corosync membership got broken on siteb-1 node
> >   (hard to tell why, the only thing we can observe is that
> >    sbd monitoring was moved there from sitea-1)
> > 
> > - then: dlm_controld on sitea-1, which already observed that 
membership
> >   issue of siteb-1, proceed to ask pacemaker to fence siteb-1, which
> >   was cheerfully executed by sitea-2 node
> > 
> > I cannot really tell what the root cause was here, but observing PID
> > as high as 171087, I wonder if you have recent enough libqb (0.17.2):
> 
> if it's unclear, 0.17.2 as the lowest version that's fixed

following version is currently installed with SP3:

libqb0-1.0.1-2.15.x86_64

> 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114852
> > 
> > (and would perhaps fit: new sbd process/es with high enough PIDs,
> 
> actually, crm_attribute processes arising from stonith:external/sbd
> 
> (fun fact: fence_sbd agent from fence-agents project, using a bit
> different API for fencing, doesn't need to resort to relying on
> stonith-timeout cluster property, so it doesn't involved such
> "calling home")
> 
> > exercising libqb-backed IPC -> something bad happening like
> > corosync getting stuck or crashing -> node kicked out...)
> 
> -- 
> Nazdar,
> Jan (Poki)
> [Anhang "attlmf24.dat" gelöscht von Philipp Achmüller/ARZ/AT] 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180719/cf0a2550/attachment.html>