[ClusterLabs] Antw: [questionnaire] Do you overload pacemaker's meta-attributes to track your own data?

[Ulrich Windl]

>>> Jan Pokorný <jpokorny at redhat.com> schrieb am 28.06.2018 um 20:23 in
Nachricht
<20180628182329.GB4826 at redhat.com>:
[...]
> * * *
> 
> So now the promised questions; just send a reply where you [x] tick
> your selections for the questions below, possibly with some more
> commentary on the topic, and preferrably on‑list (single of your
> choice is enough):
> 
> 1. In your cluster configurations, do you carry meta‑attributes
>    other than those recognized by pacemaker?
> 
>    [ ] no

--> NO

> 
>    [ ] yes (if so, can you specify whether for said constraints
>             rules, as a way to permanently attach some kind of
>             administrative piece of information, whether you
>             have the whole custom tooling around this, etc.?)
> 
> 2. How do you feel about said meta‑attributes' namespace separation
>    proposal (as summarized in documentation edit per above link)?
> 
>    [ ] no feelings/not related to my use cases (e.g., haven't used
>        custom meta‑attributes possibility before, no inclination to
>        use that in the future)

--> X (the above)

> 
>    [ ] too cumbersome, better to live with the risk of the future
>        clashes now (and with the risk of distant future automatic
>        upgrade doing accidentally a wrong thing)
> 
>    [ ] acceptable, but only as an interim solution
> 
>    [ ] acceptable without complaints
> 
> * * *
> 
> I am also keen to hear if this rather non‑intrusive change alone could
> be a show‑stopper for some.
> 
> Thanks for your feedback!
> 
> 
> [1] e.g. for primitive resources:
>     
> https://clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/doc/en‑US/Pacemaker/1.1/html‑single/Pacem

> aker_Explained/index.html#_resource_meta_attributes
> [2] 
> https://clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/doc/en‑US/Pacemaker/1.1/html‑single/Pacem

> aker_Explained/index.html#_node_attribute_expressions
> 
> ‑‑ 
> Jan (Poki)