[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

Ulrich Windl Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de
Mon Jan 29 02:17:40 EST 2018

>>> Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr at dalibo.com> schrieb am 26.01.2018 um 09:07 in
Nachricht <20180126090746.4831c1a8 at firost>:
> In 1.1.x, there is exactly three states: stopped, started, promoted.

If there is a state "promoted", what about "deomoted"?
Likewise: What about "starting", "stopping", "promoting" and "demoting"?
> In 1.1.x, there is exactly two roles: slave and master.

It sounds as if states and roles were orthogonal concepts, when obviously they aren't.
It sounds as if more states were needed, but the pacemaker framework doesn't support those.
Isn't a rule just a state is disguise?



More information about the Users mailing list