[ClusterLabs] Three node cluster becomes completely fenced if one node leaves

[Seth Reid]

The original message has the logs from nodes 1 and 3. Node 2, the one that
got fenced in this test, doesn't really show much. Here are the logs from
it:

Mar 24 16:35:10 b014 ntpd[2318]: Deleting interface #5 enp6s0f0,
192.168.100.14#123, interface stats: received=0, sent=0, dropped=0,
active_time=3253 secs
Mar 24 16:35:10 b014 ntpd[2318]: Deleting interface #7 enp6s0f0,
fe80::a236:9fff:fe8a:6500%6#123, interface stats: received=0, sent=0,
dropped=0, active_time=3253 secs
Mar 24 16:35:13 b014 corosync[2166]: notice  [TOTEM ] A processor failed,
forming new configuration.
Mar 24 16:35:13 b014 corosync[2166]:  [TOTEM ] A processor failed, forming
new configuration.
Mar 24 16:35:13 b014 corosync[2166]: notice  [TOTEM ] The network interface
is down.
Mar 24 16:35:13 b014 corosync[2166]: notice  [TOTEM ] adding new UDPU
member {192.168.100.13}
Mar 24 16:35:13 b014 corosync[2166]: notice  [TOTEM ] adding new UDPU
member {192.168.100.14}
Mar 24 16:35:13 b014 corosync[2166]: notice  [TOTEM ] adding new UDPU
member {192.168.100.15}
Mar 24 16:35:13 b014 corosync[2166]:  [TOTEM ] The network interface is
down.
Mar 24 16:35:13 b014 corosync[2166]:  [TOTEM ] adding new UDPU member
{192.168.100.13}
Mar 24 16:35:13 b014 corosync[2166]:  [TOTEM ] adding new UDPU member
{192.168.100.14}
Mar 24 16:35:13 b014 corosync[2166]:  [TOTEM ] adding new UDPU member
{192.168.100.15}

-------
Seth Reid



On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Bob Peterson <rpeterso at redhat.com> wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> | I will try to install updated packages from ubuntu 16.10 or newer. It
> can't
> | get worse than not working.
> |
> | Can you think of any logs that might help? I've enabled debug on corosync
> | log, but it really doesn't show anything else other than corosync
> exiting.
> | Any diagnostic tools you can recommend?
> |
> | -------
> | Seth Reid
>
>
> Hi Seth,
>
> Can you post the pertinent messages from the consoles of all nodes in the
> cluster? Hopefully you were monitoring them.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bob Peterson
> Red Hat File Systems
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
> http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170330/9ddc8217/attachment-0003.html>