[ClusterLabs] Does an order set include colocation of resources?

[Jeff Johnson]

If I have a resource group:

# pcs resource show
 Resource Group: nfs-zfs
     nfsnet (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2): Started server-a-hb.internal
     nfs-daemon (ocf::heartbeat:nfsserver): Started server-a-hb.internal
     samba (systemd:smb): Started server-a-hb.internal
     netbios (systemd:nmb): Started server-a-hb.internal
     nfspool (ocf::heartbeat:ZFS): Started server-a-hb.internal


and I create a constraint order set:

`pcs constraint order set virtip nfssvr samba netbios nfspool`


does that order set inherit any enforcement of colocation as well?

If not, how does colocation get applied to a resource group with ordered
start/stop? Does the resource grouping or order set include some default
enforcement of colocation?

Thanks,

--Jeff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170614/bca0e222/attachment-0002.html>