[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: DRBD or SAN ?
Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de
Wed Jul 19 06:29:32 UTC 2017
>>> Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> schrieb am 18.07.2017 um 18:15 in Nachricht
<06a7a06f-15f4-3194-00a8-ca043dbc71bb at alteeve.ca>:
> As for replication errors, well, you're judging something without using
> it, I have to conclude. In all our years using DRBD, we have never had a
> data corruption issue or any other problem induced by DRBD. We sure have
> been saved by in on several occasions.
Maybe it's like with the cluster: Once you have set it up correctly, it runs quite well, but the wy to get there may be painful. I quit my experiments with dual-primary DRBD in some early SLES11 (SP1), because it fenced a lot and refused to come up automatically after fencing. That may have been a configuration problem, but with the docs at hand at that time, I preferred to quit and try something else.
More information about the Users