[ClusterLabs] DRBD or SAN ?
kgaillot at redhat.com
Tue Jul 18 15:29:45 UTC 2017
On 07/18/2017 09:34 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
> ----- On Jul 17, 2017, at 11:51 AM, Bernd Lentes bernd.lentes at helmholtz-muenchen.de wrote:
>> i established a two node cluster with two HP servers and SLES 11 SP4. I'd like
>> to start now with a test period. Resources are virtual machines. The vm's
>> reside on a FC SAN. The SAN has two power supplies, two storage controller, two
>> network interfaces for configuration. Each storage controller has two FC
>> connectors. On each server i have one FC controller with two connectors in a
>> multipath configuration. Each connector from the SAN controller inside the
>> server is connected to a different storage controller from the SAN. But isn't a
>> SAN, despite all that redundancy, a SPOF ?
>> I'm asking myself if a DRBD configuration wouldn't be more redundant and high
>> available. There i have two completely independent instances of the vm.
>> We have one web application with a databse which is really crucial for us.
>> Downtime should be maximum one or two hours, if longer we run in trouble.
>> Is DRBD in conjuction with a database (MySQL or Postgres) possible ?
> Is with DRBD and Virtual Machines live migration possible ?
Yes, definitely. In the past, I've even live-migrated a VM with 24GB RAM
over 10gigE very quickly, with LVM over DRBD underneath.
> Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen
> Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH)
> Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1
> 85764 Neuherberg
> Aufsichtsratsvorsitzende: MinDir'in Baerbel Brumme-Bothe
> Geschaeftsfuehrer: Prof. Dr. Guenther Wess, Heinrich Bassler, Dr. Alfons Enhsen
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 6466
> USt-IdNr: DE 129521671
More information about the Users