[ClusterLabs] 2-Node Cluster Pointless?
dmaziuk at bmrb.wisc.edu
Mon Apr 17 14:21:42 EDT 2017
On 04/17/2017 01:12 PM, Ian wrote:
> No, I don't understand how it's relevant to the specific topic of avoiding
> split-brains, either.
>> Take a simple example of shared-nothing read-only cluster: all you need
>> to know is that the daemon is bound to '*' and the floating ip is bound
>> to eth0.
In shred-nothing cluster "split brain" means whichever MAC address is in
ARP cache of the border router is the one that gets the traffic. How
does the existing code figure this one out?
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Users