[ClusterLabs] [Linux-ha-dev] Announcing crmsh release 2.1.7
kgaillot at redhat.com
Fri Sep 23 15:06:19 EDT 2016
On 09/23/2016 06:59 AM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:
>>> Out of curiosity: What do you use it for, where the two_node option
> is not sufficient?
> Alongside with starting the cluster with two nodes I need that
> possibility of starting the cluster with only one node.
> "two_node" option doesn't provide that.
Actually it can, if you use "two_node: 1" with "wait_for_all: 0".
The risk with that configuration is that both nodes can start without
seeing each other, and both start resources.
> Thank you,
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Kristoffer Grönlund <kgronlund at suse.com
> <mailto:kgronlund at suse.com>> wrote:
> Kostiantyn Ponomarenko <konstantin.ponomarenko at gmail.com
> <mailto:konstantin.ponomarenko at gmail.com>> writes:
> > Hi,
> >>> If "scripts: no-quorum-policy=ignore" is becoming depreciated
> > Are there any plans to get rid of this option?
> > Am I missing something?
> The above is talking about crmsh cluster configuration scripts, not core
> Pacemaker. As far as I know, no-quorum-policy=ignore is not being
> deprecated in Pacemaker.
> However, it is no longer the recommended configuration for two node
> > PS: this option is very useful (vital) to me. And "two_node" option won't
> > replace it.
> Out of curiosity: What do you use it for, where the two_node option is
> not sufficient?
> // Kristoffer Grönlund
> // kgronlund at suse.com <mailto:kgronlund at suse.com>
More information about the Users