[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: When the DC crmd is frozen, cluster decisions are delayed infinitely
kwenning at redhat.com
Thu Sep 8 08:32:34 EDT 2016
On 09/08/2016 02:28 PM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>>> Klaus Wenninger <kwenning at redhat.com> schrieb am 08.09.2016 um 09:13 in
> Nachricht <4c828344-44da-1d93-b43f-a305cfaa5402 at redhat.com>:
>> On 09/08/2016 08:55 AM, Digimer wrote:
>>> On 08/09/16 03:47 PM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>>>>>> Shermal Fernando <shermalfe at millenniumit.com> schrieb am 08.09.2016 um 06:41
>>>> <8CE6E8D87F896546B9C65ED80D30A4336578CB4A at LG-SPMB-MBX02.lseg.stockex.local>:
>>>>> The whole cluster will fail if the DC (crm daemon) is frozen due to CPU
>>>>> starvation or hanging while trying to perform a IO operation.
>>>>> Please share some thoughts on this issue.
>>>> What is "the whole cluster will fail"? If the DC times out, some recovery
>> will take place.
>>> Yup. The starved node should be declared lost by corosync, the remaining
>>> nodes reform and if they're still quorate, the hung node should be
>>> fenced. Recovery occur and life goes on.
>> Didn't happen in my test (SIGSTOP to crmd).
>> Might be a configuration mistake though...
>> Even had sbd with a watchdog active (amongst
>> other - real - fencing devices).
>> Thinking if it might make sense so tickle the
>> crmd-API from sbd-pacemaker-watcher ...
> OK, so we mix "DC" and crmd. crmd is just a part of the DC. I guess if corosync is up and happy, but crmd is silent, the cluster just thinks that the DC has nothing to say.
> But I still wonder what will happen if crmd is goinf to send some reply to a command.
Just lost accuracy during discussion. We did stop crmd on the DC.
>>> Unless you don't have fencing, then may $deity of mercy. ;)
>> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
More information about the Users