[ClusterLabs] RFC: allowing soft recovery attempts before ignore/block/etc.

[Jan Pokorný]

On 21/09/16 10:51 +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Our first proposed approach would add a new hard-fail-threshold
>> operation property. If specified, the cluster would first try restarting
>> the resource on the same node,
> 
> 
> Well, just as now, it would be _allowed_ to start on the same node, but
> this is not guaranteed.

Yeah, I should attend doublethink classes to understand "the same
node" term better:

https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/pull/1146/commits/3b3fc1fd8f2c95d8ab757711cf096cf231f27941


-- 
Jan (Poki)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160922/fa4f6bed/attachment.sig>