[ClusterLabs] Special care needed when upgrading Pacemaker Remote nodes
Andrei Borzenkov
arvidjaar at gmail.com
Mon Oct 31 16:17:34 UTC 2016
31.10.2016 17:15, Ken Gaillot пишет:
> On 10/29/2016 07:55 AM, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
>> Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> This spurred me to complete a long-planned overhaul of Pacemaker
>>> Explained's "Upgrading" appendix:
>>>
>>> http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1-pcs/html/Pacemaker_Explained/_upgrading.html
>>>
>>> Feedback is welcome.
>>
>> Since you asked for it..:)
>>
>> 1. Table D.1.: why does a rolling upgrade imply any service outage? Always?
>
> Putting a node into standby will move all resources off it, so there's
> at least a brief outage. Although I suppose if all of your resources are
> live-migratable there wouldn't be. :) Probably worth a footnote to clarify.
>
What about stopping pacemaker leaving resources running, upgrading
pacemaker on the node, starting pacemaker? Is it technically possible?
More information about the Users
mailing list