[ClusterLabs] Corosync ring shown faulty between healthy nodes & networks (rrp_mode: passive)

Thu Oct 6 17:12:06 UTC 2016

On 10/06/2016 11:25 AM, Klaus Wenninger wrote:

> But it is convenient because all layers on top can be completely
> agnostic of the duplicity.

It's also cheap: failing over a node, esp. when taking over involves
replaying a database log, or even just re-establishing a bunch of nfs
connections, is way more disruptive than mdadm going into "degraded"
state and sending you an e-mail.

-- 
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20161006/afceb191/attachment-0004.sig>