[ClusterLabs] Special care needed when upgrading Pacemaker Remote nodes
wferi at niif.hu
Sat Oct 29 08:55:06 EDT 2016
Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com> writes:
> This spurred me to complete a long-planned overhaul of Pacemaker
> Explained's "Upgrading" appendix:
> Feedback is welcome.
Since you asked for it..:)
1. Table D.1.: why does a rolling upgrade imply any service outage? Always?
2. Detach method: why use rsc_defaults instead of maintenance mode?
3. When do you think 1.1.16 will be released? With approximately how
much ABI incompatibility in the libraries?
More information about the Users