[ClusterLabs] Replicated PGSQL woes [solved]

Israel Brewster israel at ravnalaska.net
Fri Oct 14 14:03:17 EDT 2016


> 
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 12:30 AM, Keisuke MORI <keisuke.mori+ha at gmail.com <mailto:keisuke.mori+ha at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 2016-10-14 2:04 GMT+09:00 Israel Brewster <israel at ravnalaska.net <mailto:israel at ravnalaska.net>>:
>>> Summary: Two-node cluster setup with latest pgsql resource agent. Postgresql
>>> starts initially, but failover never happens.
>> 
>>> Oct 13 08:29:47 CentTest1 pgsql(pgsql_96)[19602]: INFO: Master does not
>>> exist.
>>> Oct 13 08:29:47 CentTest1 pgsql(pgsql_96)[19602]: WARNING: My data is
>>> out-of-date. status=DISCONNECT
>>> Oct 13 08:29:51 CentTest1 pgsql(pgsql_96)[19730]: INFO: Master does not
>>> exist.
>>> Oct 13 08:29:51 CentTest1 pgsql(pgsql_96)[19730]: WARNING: My data is
>>> out-of-date. status=DISCONNECT
>>> 
>>> Those last two lines repeat indefinitely, but there is no indication that
>>> the cluster ever tries to promote centtest1 to master. Even if I completely
>>> shut down the cluster, and bring it back up only on centtest1, pacemaker
>>> refuses to start postgresql on centtest1 as a master.
>> 
>> This is because the data on centtest1 is considered "out-of-date"-ed
>> (as it says :) and and promoting the node to master might corrupt your
>> database.
> 
> Ok, that makes sense. So the problem is why the cluster thinks the data is out-of-date

Turns out the problem was a simple typo in my resource creation command: I had typed centest1.ravnalaska.net <http://centest1.ravnalaska.net/> in the node_list rather than centtest1.ravnalaska.net <http://centtest1.ravnalaska.net/> (note the missing t in the middle). So when trying to get the status, it never got a status for centtest1, which meant it defaulted to DISCONNECT and HS:alone. Once I fixed that typo, failover worked, at least so far, and I can even bring the old master back up as a slave after deleting the lock file that the RA leaves behind. Wow, that was annoying to track down! Maybe I need to be more careful about picking machine names - choose something that's harder to mess up :-)

Thanks for all the suggestions and help!
-----------------------------------------------
Israel Brewster
Systems Analyst II
Ravn Alaska
5245 Airport Industrial Rd
Fairbanks, AK 99709
(907) 450-7293
-----------------------------------------------

> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> What can I do to fix this? What troubleshooting steps can I follow? Thanks.
>>> 
>> 
>> It seems that the latest data should be only on centtest2 so the
>> recovering steps should be something like:
>> - start centtest2 as master
>> - take the basebackup from centtest2 to centtest1
>> - start centtest1 as slave
>> - make sure the replications is working properly
> 
> I've done that. Several times. The replication works properly with either node as the master. Initially I had started centtest1 as master, because that's where I was planning to *have* the master, however when pacemaker keep insisting on starting centtest2 as the master, I also tried setting things up that way. No luck: everything works fine, but no failover.
> 
>> 
>> see below for details.
>> http://clusterlabs.org/wiki/PgSQL_Replicated_Cluster <http://clusterlabs.org/wiki/PgSQL_Replicated_Cluster>
> Yep, that's where I started from on this little adventure :-)
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Also, it would be helpful to check 'pgsql-data-status' and
>> 'pgsql-status' attributes displayed by 'crm_mon -A' to diagnose
>> whether the replications is going well or not.
>> 
>> The slave node should have the attributes like below, otherwise the
>> replications is going something wrong and the node will never be
>> promoted because it does not have the proper data.
>> 
>> ```
>> * Node node2:
>>    + master-pgsql                      : 100
>>    + pgsql-data-status                 : STREAMING|SYNC
>>    + pgsql-status                      : HS:sync
>> ```
> 
> Now THAT is interesting. I get this:
> 
> Node Attributes:
> * Node centtest1.ravnalaska.net <http://centtest1.ravnalaska.net/>:
>     + master-pgsql_96                   : -INFINITY 
>     + pgsql_96-data-status              : DISCONNECT
>     + pgsql_96-status                   : HS:alone  
> * Node centtest2.ravnalaska.net <http://centtest2.ravnalaska.net/>:
>     + master-pgsql_96                   : 1000
>     + pgsql_96-data-status              : LATEST    
>     + pgsql_96-master-baseline          : 00000000070171D0
>     + pgsql_96-status                   : PRI
> 
> ...Which seems to indicate that pacemaker doesn't think centtest1 is connected to or replicating centtest2 (if I am interpreting that correctly). And yet, it is: From postgres itself:
> 
> [root at CentTest2 ~]# /usr/pgsql-9.6/bin/psql -h centtest2 -U postgres
> psql (9.6.0)
> Type "help" for help.
> 
> postgres=# SELECT * FROM pg_replication_slots;
>     slot_name    | plugin | slot_type | datoid | database | active | active_pid | xmin | catalog_xmin | restart_lsn | confirmed_flush_lsn 
> -----------------+--------+-----------+--------+----------+--------+------------+------+--------------+-------------+---------------------
>  centtest_2_slot |        | physical  |        |          | t      |      27230 | 1685 |              | 0/7017438   | 
> (1 row)
> 
> postgres=# 
> 
> Notice that "active" is true, indicating that the slot is connected and, well, active. Plus, from the postgresql log on centtest1:
> 
> < 2016-10-14 08:19:38.278 AKDT > LOG:  entering standby mode
> < 2016-10-14 08:19:38.285 AKDT > LOG:  consistent recovery state reached at 0/7017358
> < 2016-10-14 08:19:38.285 AKDT > LOG:  redo starts at 0/7017358
> < 2016-10-14 08:19:38.285 AKDT > LOG:  invalid record length at 0/7017438: wanted 24, got 0
> < 2016-10-14 08:19:38.286 AKDT > LOG:  database system is ready to accept read only connections
> < 2016-10-14 08:19:38.292 AKDT > LOG:  started streaming WAL from primary at 0/7000000 on timeline 1
> 
> And furthermore, if I insert/change records on centtest2, those changes *do* show up on centtest1. So everything I can see says postgresql on centtest1 *is* connected and replicating properly, but the data status shows DISCONNECT and the service status shows HS:alone. So obviously something is wrong here.
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------
> Israel Brewster
> Systems Analyst II
> Ravn Alaska
> 5245 Airport Industrial Rd
> Fairbanks, AK 99709
> (907) 450-7293
> -----------------------------------------------
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Keisuke MORI
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org <mailto:Users at clusterlabs.org>
>> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users <http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
>> 
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20161014/e7a0fde4/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Users mailing list