[ClusterLabs] Antw: Pacemaker 1.1.16 - Release Candidate 1
Klaus Wenninger
kwenning at redhat.com
Mon Nov 7 09:47:44 UTC 2016
On 11/07/2016 10:26 AM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:12:04 +0100
> Klaus Wenninger <kwenning at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/07/2016 08:41 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>>>>> Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com> schrieb am 04.11.2016 um 22:37 in
>>>>>> Nachricht
>>> <27c2ca20-c52c-8fb4-a60f-5ae12f7ffc64 at redhat.com>:
>>>> On 11/04/2016 02:29 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com> schrieb am 03.11.2016 um 17:08 in
>>>>> Nachricht
>>>>> <8af2ff98-05fd-a2c7-f670-58d0ff68ee55 at redhat.com>:
> ...
>>>> Another possible use would be for a cron that needs to know whether a
>>>> particular resource is running, and an attribute query is quicker and
>>>> easier than something like parsing crm_mon output or probing the service.
>>> crm_mon reads parts of the CIB; crm_attribute also does, I guess, so
>>> besides of lacking options and inefficient implementation, why should one
>>> be faster than the other?
>> attrd_updater doesn't go for the CIB
> AFAIK, attrd_updater actually goes to the CIB, unless you set "--private"
> since 1.1.13:
> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/blob/master/ChangeLog#L177
That prevents values being stored in the CIB. attrd_updater should
always talk to attrd as I got it ...
More information about the Users
mailing list