[ClusterLabs] How Pacemaker reacts to fast changes of the same parameter in configuration

[Kostiantyn Ponomarenko]

When one problem seems to be solved, another one appears.
Now my script looks this way:

    crm --wait configure rsc_defaults resource-stickiness=50
    crm configure rsc_defaults resource-stickiness=150

While now I am sure that transactions caused by the first command won't be
aborted, I see another possible problem here.
With a minimum load in the cluster it took 22 sec for this script to
finish.
I see here a weakness.
If a node on which this script is called goes down for any reasons, then
"resource-stickiness" is not set back to its original value, which is vary
bad.

So, now I am thinking of how to solve this problem. I would appreciate any
thoughts about this.

Is there a way to ask Pacemaker to do these commands sequentially so there
is no need to wait in the script?
If it is possible, than I think that my concern from above goes away.

Another thing which comes to my mind - is to use time based rules.
This ways when I need to do a manual fail-back, I simply set (or update) a
time-based rule from the script.
And the rule will basically say - set "resource-stickiness" to 50 right now
and expire in 10 min.
This looks good at the first glance, but there is no a reliable way to put
a minimum sufficient time for it; at least not I am aware of.
And the thing is - it is important to me that "resource-stickiness" is set
back to its original value as soon as possible.

Those are my thoughts. As I said, I appreciate any ideas here.


Thank you,
Kostia

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <dejanmm at fastmail.fm>
wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 12:54:10PM +0100, Klaus Wenninger wrote:
> > On 11/08/2016 11:40 AM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I need a way to do a manual fail-back on demand.
> > > To be clear, I don't want it to be ON/OFF; I want it to be more like
> > > "one shot".
> > > So far I found that the most reasonable way to do it - is to set
> > > "resource stickiness" to a different value, and then set it back to
> > > what it was.
> > > To do that I created a simple script with two lines:
> > >
> > >     crm configure rsc_defaults resource-stickiness=50
> > >     crm configure rsc_defaults resource-stickiness=150
> > >
> > > There are no timeouts before setting the original value back.
> > > If I call this script, I get what I want - Pacemaker moves resources
> > > to their preferred locations, and "resource stickiness" is set back to
> > > its original value.
> > >
> > > Despite it works, I still have few concerns about this approach.
> > > Will I get the same behavior under a big load with delays on systems
> > > in cluster (which is truly possible and a normal case in my
> environment)?
> > > How Pacemaker treats fast change of this parameter?
> > > I am worried that if "resource stickiness" is set back to its original
> > > value to fast, then no fail-back will happen. Is it possible, or I
> > > shouldn't worry about it?
> >
> > AFAIK pengine is interrupted when calculating a more complicated
> transition
> > and if the situation has changed a transition that is just being executed
> > is aborted if the input from pengine changed.
> > So I would definitely worry!
> > What you could do is to issue 'crm_simulate -Ls' in between and grep for
> > an empty transition.
> > There might be more elegant ways but that should be safe.
>
> crmsh has an option (-w) to wait for the PE to settle after
> committing configuration changes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dejan
> >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Kostia
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
> > > http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> > > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/
> doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> > > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
> > http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20161109/73a87e0f/attachment-0002.html>