[ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster

‪H Yavari‬ ‪ hyavari at rocketmail.com
Wed May 18 07:57:08 EDT 2016

Thank you for reply. 
I tested the first method "multi-site cluster". it was ok with ticket manually assignment. But I had issues with running Booth.I tested second method "constraints and attributes". I make a cluster with 4 nodes and define some constraints for nodes. But I have problems with node relations now.
I was searching in the docs then I found "http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Remote/ch05.html".I thinks this is very close to my answer. Do you offer this solution?

      From: Kristoffer Grönlund <kgronlund at suse.com>
 To: ‪H Yavari‬ ‪ <hyavari at rocketmail.com>; Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed <users at clusterlabs.org> 
 Sent: Wednesday, 18 May 2016, 10:36:39
 Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster
‪H Yavari‬ ‪ <hyavari at rocketmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
> So you think for this solution Booth is better or attribute method? I'm not familiar with them so can you share your experiences with them?Many thanks.

I think a single cluster using node attributes should be a lot easier to
understand and maintain, so I'd recommend that solution if it works out
for you.


// Kristoffer Grönlund
// kgronlund at suse.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160518/8767d245/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the Users mailing list