[ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster
hyavari at rocketmail.com
Wed May 18 07:57:08 EDT 2016
Thank you for reply.
I tested the first method "multi-site cluster". it was ok with ticket manually assignment. But I had issues with running Booth.I tested second method "constraints and attributes". I make a cluster with 4 nodes and define some constraints for nodes. But I have problems with node relations now.
I was searching in the docs then I found "http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Remote/ch05.html".I thinks this is very close to my answer. Do you offer this solution?
From: Kristoffer Grönlund <kgronlund at suse.com>
To: H Yavari <hyavari at rocketmail.com>; Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed <users at clusterlabs.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 18 May 2016, 10:36:39
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Two related Cluster
H Yavari <hyavari at rocketmail.com> writes:
> So you think for this solution Booth is better or attribute method? I'm not familiar with them so can you share your experiences with them?Many thanks.
I think a single cluster using node attributes should be a lot easier to
understand and maintain, so I'd recommend that solution if it works out
// Kristoffer Grönlund
// kgronlund at suse.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Users