[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Using different folder for /var/lib/pacemaker and usage of /dev/shm files

Tue May 17 09:07:54 UTC 2016

What I would like to understand is how much total shared memory
(approximately) would Pacemaker need so that accordingly I can define the
partition size. Currently it is 300 MB in our system. I recently ran into
insufficient shared memory issue because of improper clean-up. So would
like to understand how much Pacemaker would need for a 6-node cluster so
that accordingly I can increase it.

# df -kh
tmpfs                   300.0M     27.5M    272.5M   9% /dev/shm

Thanks
Nikhil

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Ulrich Windl <
Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> One of the main problems I identified with POSIX shared memory (/dev/shm)
> in Linux is that changes to the shared memory don't affect the i-node, so
> you cannot tell from a "ls -rtl" which segments are still active and which
> are not. You can only see the creation time.
>
> Maybe there should be a tool that identifies and cleans up obsolete shared
> memory.
> I don't understand the part talking about the size of /dev/shm: It's
> shared memory. See "kernel.shmmax" and "kernel.shmall" in you sysctl
> settings (/etc/sysctl.conf).
>
> Regards,
> Ulrich
>
> >>> Nikhil Utane <nikhil.subscribed at gmail.com> schrieb am 16.05.2016 um
> 14:31 in
> Nachricht
> <CAGNWmJVSye5PJgkdbFAi5AzO+Qq-j=2fS1c+0rGnqS994vV48w at mail.gmail.com>:
> > Thanks Ken.
> >
> > Could you also respond on the second question?
> >
> >>     Also, in /dev/shm I see that it created around 300+ files of around
> >>     250 MB.
> >>
> >>     For e.g.
> >>     -rw-rw----    1 hacluste hacluste      8232 May  6 13:03
> >>     qb-cib_rw-response-25035-25038-10-header
> >>     -rw-rw----    1 hacluste hacluste    540672 May  6 13:03
> >>     qb-cib_rw-response-25035-25038-10-data
> >>     -rw-------    1 hacluste hacluste      8232 May  6 13:03
> >>     qb-cib_rw-response-25035-25036-12-header
> >>     -rw-------    1 hacluste hacluste    540672 May  6 13:03
> >>     qb-cib_rw-response-25035-25036-12-data
> >>     And many more..
> >>
> >>     We have limited space in /dev/shm and all these files are filling it
> >>     up. Are these all needed? Any way to limit? Do we need to do any
> >>     clean-up if pacemaker termination was not graceful? What's the
> > recommended size for this folder for Pacemaker? Our cluster will have
> > maximum 6 nodes.
> >
> > -Regards
> > Nikhil
> >
> > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/08/2016 11:19 PM, Nikhil Utane wrote:
> >> > Moving these questions to a different thread.
> >> >
> >> >     Hi,
> >> >
> >> >     We have limited storage capacity in our system for different
> folders.
> >> >     How can I configure to use a different folder for
> /var/lib/pacemaker?
> >>
> >> ./configure --localstatedir=/wherever (defaults to /var or
> ${prefix}/var)
> >>
> >> That will change everything that normally is placed or looked for under
> >> /var (/var/lib/pacemaker, /var/lib/heartbeat, /var/run, etc.).
> >>
> >> Note that while ./configure lets you change the location of nearly
> >> everything, /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d is an exception, because it is
> >> specified in the OCF standard.
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >     Also, in /dev/shm I see that it created around 300+ files of
> around
> >> >     250 MB.
> >> >
> >> >     For e.g.
> >> >     -rw-rw----    1 hacluste hacluste      8232 May  6 13:03
> >> >     qb-cib_rw-response-25035-25038-10-header
> >> >     -rw-rw----    1 hacluste hacluste    540672 May  6 13:03
> >> >     qb-cib_rw-response-25035-25038-10-data
> >> >     -rw-------    1 hacluste hacluste      8232 May  6 13:03
> >> >     qb-cib_rw-response-25035-25036-12-header
> >> >     -rw-------    1 hacluste hacluste    540672 May  6 13:03
> >> >     qb-cib_rw-response-25035-25036-12-data
> >> >     And many more..
> >> >
> >> >     We have limited space in /dev/shm and all these files are filling
> it
> >> >     up. Are these all needed? Any way to limit? Do we need to do any
> >> >     clean-up if pacemaker termination was not graceful?
> >> >
> >> >     -Thanks
> >> >     Nikhil
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
> >> > http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >> >
> >> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> >> > Getting started:
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> >> > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
> >> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>
> >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> >> Getting started:
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> >> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
> >>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160517/702f0769/attachment-0002.html>