[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: no clone for pcs-based cluster fencing?

Ulrich Windl Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de
Mon Mar 21 10:34:20 EDT 2016

>>> Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com> schrieb am 21.03.2016 um 15:22 in Nachricht
<56F003B0.4020800 at redhat.com>:

> It's actually newer pacemaker versions rather than pcs itself. Fence
> agents do not need to be cloned, or even running -- as long as they're
> configured and enabled, any node can use the resource. The node that's
> "running" the fence device will be the one that monitors it, and as a
> result it will be preferred to execute the fencing if possible.

Q: How can I find out which node is running the fencing device when not having configured a monitor?



More information about the Users mailing list