[ClusterLabs] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: pacemakerd: undefined symbol: crm_procfs_process_info

philipp.achmueller at arz.at philipp.achmueller at arz.at
Thu Mar 24 17:44:46 CET 2016


Jan Pokorný <jpokorny at redhat.com> schrieb am 24.03.2016 15:38:38:

> Von: Jan Pokorný <jpokorny at redhat.com>
> An: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering 
> welcomed <users at clusterlabs.org>
> Datum: 24.03.2016 15:50
> Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: pacemakerd: 
> undefined symbol: crm_procfs_process_info
> 
> On 24/03/16 14:38 +0100, philipp.achmueller at arz.at wrote:
> > Jan Pokorný <jpokorny at redhat.com> schrieb am 24.03.2016 12:48:44:
> > 
> >> Von: Jan Pokorný <jpokorny at redhat.com>
> >> An: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering 
> >> welcomed <users at clusterlabs.org>
> >> Datum: 24.03.2016 12:50
> >> Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] Antwort: Re: pacemakerd: undefined 
> >> symbol: crm_procfs_process_info
> >> 
> >> On 24/03/16 08:44 +0100, philipp.achmueller at arz.at wrote:
> >>> Jan Pokorný <jpokorny at redhat.com> schrieb am 23.03.2016 19:22:13:
> >>> 
> >>>> Von: Jan Pokorný <jpokorny at redhat.com>
> >>>> An: users at clusterlabs.org
> >>>> Datum: 23.03.2016 19:23
> >>>> Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] pacemakerd: undefined symbol: 
> >>>> crm_procfs_process_info
> >>>> 
> >>>> On 23/03/16 18:40 +0100, philipp.achmueller at arz.at wrote:
> >>>>> $ sudo pacemakerd -V
> >>>>> pacemakerd: symbol lookup error: pacemakerd: undefined symbol: 
> >>>>> crm_procfs_process_info
> >>>> 
> >>>> For a start, please provide output of:
> >>>> 
> >>>> ls -l $(rpm -E %{_libdir})/libcrmcommon.so*
> >>>> ldd $(rpm -E %{_sbindir})/pacemakerd
> >>>> 
> >>>> Adjust the path per your actual installation, also depending
> >>>> how you got the pacemaker installed: from RPMs (assumed),
> >>>> by starting with the sources and compiling by hand, etc.
> >>> 
> >>> i got sources from github and compiled by hand. 
> >>> 
> >>>> Note that if RPMs were indeed used, you should rather make sure
> >>>> that the same version of the packages arising from single
> >>>> SRPM is installed (pacemaker, pacemaker-libs, ...).
> >>> 
> >>> on that hint - i removed all old source directories and startet new 
> >>> download/compilation today.
> >>> after that everything works like expected - may i messed up some old 

> > files 
> >>> in working directory.
> >> 
> >> Do you use "make install" as part of your procedure?
> >> Where I was headed is that either "ldconfig" invocation might be
> >> missing once the libraries are at place, or that /usr/lib* remnants
> >> take precedence over /usr/local/lib* files in run-time linking
> >> (provided that use use default installation prefix).
> > 
> > Yes, i use "make install" with default parameters to install to my 
> > environment. still not sure what happened yesterday - may some file 
> > permission issues during sync files in my environments.
> 
> Additional syncing step might add this sort of fragility.
> Anyway, please keep an eye on this should it ever be reproduced.
> It's hard to claim native build/install arrangement is flawless
> in any case.
>
 
I will have a look at that for future installations.
Is there any documentation in which order i have to install all relevant 
cluster components when installing/compiling it with sources from 
ClusterLabs repository?

> -- 
> Jan (Poki)
> [Anhang "att7fk8o.dat" gelöscht von Philipp Achmüller/ARZ/AT] 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160324/a9934e72/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Users mailing list