[ClusterLabs] Pacemaker license
andrew at beekhof.net
Sun Jan 24 22:17:23 EST 2016
> On 20 Jan 2016, at 4:06 AM, Jan Pokorný <jpokorny at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12/01/16 11:27 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On 6 Oct 2015, at 9:39 AM, Santosh_Bidaralli at Dell.com wrote:
>>> As per the given link http://clusterlabs.org/wiki/License, it is
>>> mentioned that “Pacemaker programs are licensed under the GPLv2+
>>> (version 2 or later of the GPL) and its headers and libraries are
>>> under the less restrictive LGPLv2+ (version 2 or later of the LGPL)
>>> However, website link
>>> states otherwise. Cib.h header file needed to be included in order
>>> to configure pacemaker using C API. But the header file for cib.h
>>> states that the header file is under GPL license This seems to be
>>> conflicting the statement regarding header file license.
>>> In addition, which similar issue has been discussed in the past
>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/75967, no
>>> additional details on the resolution.
>> I thought that was a pretty clear statement, but you’re correct that the licences were not changed.
>> Does this satisfy?
> Just a reminder we should review the licenses as declared at
> particular subpackages within the authoritative specfile.
> For instance, pacemaker-cli should be GPLv2+ only, AFAICT.
> And the associated license texts to be distributed along should
> reflect the reality, too:
agreed, can you merge that please?
> Jan (Poki)
> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
More information about the Users