[ClusterLabs] crmsh Question/Feature
jpokorny at redhat.com
Thu Jan 21 14:06:52 EST 2016
On 21/01/16 08:34 -0500, Marc Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Kristoffer Grönlund
> <kgronlund at suse.com> wrote:
>> Marc Smith <marc.smith at mcc.edu> writes:
>>> My question: Is there any other way to replicate this behavior using
>>> crmsh and importing a configuration from a file? If not, would the
>>> group be open to accepting a patch that adds a third load-action
>>> method that calls save() with no_remove=False?
>> Absolutely! It sounds like something we should support.
>> You can create a pull request here:
> Okay, I'll start on this. Any thoughts on the "method" keyword to use
> that will describe this? I was thinking "merge" at first, but maybe a
> different verb?
Disclaimer: this is what pcs uses with replace semantics (as requested).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Users