[ClusterLabs] crmsh Question/Feature

Jan Pokorný jpokorny at redhat.com
Thu Jan 21 14:06:52 EST 2016

On 21/01/16 08:34 -0500, Marc Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Kristoffer Grönlund
> <kgronlund at suse.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Marc Smith <marc.smith at mcc.edu> writes:
>>> My question: Is there any other way to replicate this behavior using
>>> crmsh and importing a configuration from a file? If not, would the
>>> group be open to accepting a patch that adds a third load-action
>>> method that calls save() with no_remove=False?
>> Absolutely! It sounds like something we should support.
>> You can create a pull request here:
>> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/crmsh
> Okay, I'll start on this. Any thoughts on the "method" keyword to use
> that will describe this? I was thinking "merge" at first, but maybe a
> different verb?


Disclaimer: this is what pcs uses with replace semantics (as requested).

Jan (Poki)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160121/a03b32a5/attachment-0003.sig>

More information about the Users mailing list