[ClusterLabs] Singleton resource not being migrated
Nikita Koshikov
koshikov at gmail.com
Wed Aug 17 21:52:41 UTC 2016
Thanks Ken,
I have figure out root cause. There was race condition while adding
resource and creating constrain(location).
When resource was added to cluster, all nodes trying to 'probe' resource
via ocf - and because ocf didn't exist on 2/3 nodes at that time -
pacemaker mark them as -INFINITY and even updating constrains(adding
locations) - doesn't automatically reprobe/clean resource. It was hard to
debug - because there were no errors/failed action for this resource, when
you run cli commands.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 08/05/2016 05:12 PM, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > Thanks, Ken,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Ken Gaillot <kgaillot at redhat.com
> > <mailto:kgaillot at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 08/05/2016 03:48 AM, Andreas Kurz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:08 AM, Nikita Koshikov <
> koshikov at gmail.com <mailto:koshikov at gmail.com>
> > > <mailto:koshikov at gmail.com <mailto:koshikov at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello list,
> > >
> > > Can you, please, help me in debugging 1 resource not being
> started
> > > after node failover ?
> > >
> > > Here is configuration that I'm testing:
> > > 3 nodes(kvm VM) cluster, that have:
> > >
> > > node 10: aic-controller-58055.test.domain.local
> > > node 6: aic-controller-50186.test.domain.local
> > > node 9: aic-controller-12993.test.domain.local
> > > primitive cmha cmha \
> > > params conffile="/etc/cmha/cmha.conf"
> > > daemon="/usr/bin/cmhad" pidfile="/var/run/cmha/cmha.pid"
> > user=cmha \
> > > meta failure-timeout=30 resource-stickiness=1
> > > target-role=Started migration-threshold=3 \
> > > op monitor interval=10 on-fail=restart timeout=20 \
> > > op start interval=0 on-fail=restart timeout=60 \
> > > op stop interval=0 on-fail=block timeout=90
> > >
> > >
> > > What is the output of crm_mon -1frA once a node is down ... any
> failed
> > > actions?
> > >
> > >
> > > primitive sysinfo_aic-controller-12993.test.domain.local
> > > ocf:pacemaker:SysInfo \
> > > params disk_unit=M disks="/ /var/log"
> min_disk_free=512M \
> > > op monitor interval=15s
> > > primitive sysinfo_aic-controller-50186.test.domain.local
> > > ocf:pacemaker:SysInfo \
> > > params disk_unit=M disks="/ /var/log"
> min_disk_free=512M \
> > > op monitor interval=15s
> > > primitive sysinfo_aic-controller-58055.test.domain.local
> > > ocf:pacemaker:SysInfo \
> > > params disk_unit=M disks="/ /var/log"
> min_disk_free=512M \
> > > op monitor interval=15s
> > >
> > >
> > > You can use a clone for this sysinfo resource and a symmetric
> cluster
> > > for a more compact configuration .... then you can skip all these
> > > location constraints.
> > >
> > >
> > > location cmha-on-aic-controller-12993.test.domain.local cmha
> 100:
> > > aic-controller-12993.test.domain.local
> > > location cmha-on-aic-controller-50186.test.domain.local cmha
> 100:
> > > aic-controller-50186.test.domain.local
> > > location cmha-on-aic-controller-58055.test.domain.local cmha
> 100:
> > > aic-controller-58055.test.domain.local
> > > location sysinfo-on-aic-controller-12993.test.domain.local
> > > sysinfo_aic-controller-12993.test.domain.local inf:
> > > aic-controller-12993.test.domain.local
> > > location sysinfo-on-aic-controller-50186.test.domain.local
> > > sysinfo_aic-controller-50186.test.domain.local inf:
> > > aic-controller-50186.test.domain.local
> > > location sysinfo-on-aic-controller-58055.test.domain.local
> > > sysinfo_aic-controller-58055.test.domain.local inf:
> > > aic-controller-58055.test.domain.local
> > > property cib-bootstrap-options: \
> > > have-watchdog=false \
> > > dc-version=1.1.14-70404b0 \
> > > cluster-infrastructure=corosync \
> > > cluster-recheck-interval=15s \
> > >
> > >
> > > Never tried such a low cluster-recheck-interval ... wouldn't do
> > that. I
> > > saw setups with low intervals burning a lot of cpu cycles in bigger
> > > cluster setups and side-effects from aborted transitions. If you
> > do this
> > > for "cleanup" the cluster state because you see resource-agent
> errors
> > > you should better fix the resource agent.
> >
> > Strongly agree -- your recheck interval is lower than the various
> action
> > timeouts. The only reason recheck interval should ever be set less
> than
> > about 5 minutes is if you have time-based rules that you want to
> trigger
> > with a finer granularity.
> >
> > Your issue does not appear to be coming from recheck interval,
> otherwise
> > it would go away after the recheck interval passed.
> >
> >
> > As of small cluster-recheck-interval - this was only for testing.
> >
> >
> > > Regards,
> > > Andreas
> > >
> > >
> > > no-quorum-policy=stop \
> > > stonith-enabled=false \
> > > start-failure-is-fatal=false \
> > > symmetric-cluster=false \
> > > node-health-strategy=migrate-on-red \
> > > last-lrm-refresh=1470334410
> > >
> > > When 3 nodes online, everything seemed OK, this is output of
> > > scoreshow.sh:
> > > Resource Score
> > > Node Stickiness #Fail
> > > Migration-Threshold
> > > cmha
> -INFINITY
> > > aic-controller-12993.test.domain.local 1 0
> > > cmha
> > > 101 aic-controller-50186.test.domain.local 1 0
> > > cmha
> -INFINITY
> >
> > Everything is not OK; cmha has -INFINITY scores on two nodes,
> meaning it
> > won't be allowed to run on them. This is why it won't start after the
> > one allowed node goes down, and why cleanup gets it working again
> > (cleanup removes bans caused by resource failures).
> >
> > It's likely the resource previously failed the maximum allowed times
> > (migration-threshold=3) on those two nodes.
> >
> > The next step would be to figure out why the resource is failing. The
> > pacemaker logs will show any output from the resource agent.
> >
> >
> > Resource was never started on these nodes. Maybe problem is in flow ? We
> > deploy:
> >
> > 1) 1 node with all 3 IPs in corosync.conf
> > 2) set no-quorum policy = ignore
> > 3) add 2 nodes to corosync cluster
> > 4) create resource + 1 location constrain
> > 5) add 2 additional constrains
> > 6) set no-quorum policy = stop
> >
> > The time between 4-5 is about 1 minute. And it's clear why 2 nodes were
> > -INFINITY in this period. But why when we add 2 more constrains - they
> > are not updating scores and cam this be changed ?
>
> The resource may have never started on those nodes, but are you sure a
> start wasn't attempted and failed? If the start failed, the -INFINITY
> score would come from the failure, rather than only the cluster being
> asymmetric.
>
> >
> >
> >
> > > aic-controller-58055.test.domain.local 1 0
> > > sysinfo_aic-controller-12993.test.domain.local
> INFINITY
> > > aic-controller-12993.test.domain.local 0 0
> > > sysinfo_aic-controller-50186.test.domain.local
> -INFINITY
> > > aic-controller-50186.test.domain.local 0 0
> > > sysinfo_aic-controller-58055.test.domain.local
> INFINITY
> > > aic-controller-58055.test.domain.local 0 0
> > >
> > > The problem starts when 1 node, goes offline
> > (aic-controller-50186).
> > > The resource cmha is stocked in stopped state.
> > > Here is the showscores:
> > > Resource Score
> > > Node Stickiness #Fail
> > > Migration-Threshold
> > > cmha
> -INFINITY
> > > aic-controller-12993.test.domain.local 1 0
> > > cmha
> -INFINITY
> > > aic-controller-50186.test.domain.local 1 0
> > > cmha
> -INFINITY
> > > aic-controller-58055.test.domain.local 1 0
> > >
> > > Even it has target-role=Started pacemaker skipping this
> resource.
> > > And in logs I see:
> > > pengine: info: native_print: cmha
> > (ocf::heartbeat:cmha):
> > > Stopped
> > > pengine: info: native_color: Resource cmha cannot run
> > anywhere
> > > pengine: info: LogActions: Leave cmha (Stopped)
> > >
> > > To recover cmha resource I need to run either:
> > > 1) crm resource cleanup cmha
> > > 2) crm resource reprobe
> > >
> > > After any of the above commands, resource began to be picked
> up be
> > > pacemaker and I see valid scores:
> > > Resource Score
> > > Node Stickiness #Fail
> > > Migration-Threshold
> > > cmha 100
> > > aic-controller-58055.test.domain.local 1 0 3
> > > cmha 101
> > > aic-controller-12993.test.domain.local 1 0 3
> > > cmha
> -INFINITY
> > > aic-controller-50186.test.domain.local 1 0 3
> > >
> > > So the questions here - why cluster-recheck doesn't work, and
> > should
> > > it do reprobing ?
> > > How to make migration work or what I missed in configuration
> that
> > > prevents migration?
> > >
> > > corosync 2.3.4
> > > pacemaker 1.1.14
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160817/8126ef42/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list