[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Performance of a mirrored LV (cLVM) with OCFS: Attempt to monitor it

[Ulrich Windl]

>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb at suse.com> schrieb am 25.04.2016 um 12:12 in
Nachricht
<20160425101236.GD10040 at suse.de>:
> On 2016-04-25T10:10:38, Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de>
wrote:
> 
> Hi Ulrich,
> 
> I can't really comment on why the cLVM2 is slow (somewhat surprisingly,
> because flock is meta-data only and thus shouldn't even be affected by
> cLVM2, anyway ...).
> 
> But on the subject of performance, you're quite right - we know that
> cLVM2 is not fast enough, thus there has been an effort to make md raid
> cluster aware (especially RAID1). cluster-md is almost completely
> merged upstream and coming to your favorite enterprise distribution very
> soon too ;-)

Lars,

that's good news.

As we've made good experience with MD-RAID, I really thought about having an
MD-RAID on one node and export that RAID via iSCSI to all the nodes that need
access. Unfortunately I cannot compare performance ahead of time 8-(

Regards,
Ulrich

> 
> 
> Regards,
>     Lars
> 
> -- 
> Architect SDS, Distinguished Engineer
> SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 
> 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org 
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org 
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf 
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org