[ClusterLabs] Re: Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: Re: EL6, cman, rrp, unicast and iptables

Noel Kuntze noel at familie-kuntze.de
Tue Sep 15 16:07:26 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hello Ullrich,

> If you send a protocol from A to B where neither A's interface nor B's
> interface has any errors, and B reports a protocol error, the obvious
> conclusion is that the protocol is broken. Es pecially if the protocol claims
> to implement reliable in-order transfer.
> Of cours from "no interface errors" you cannot deduce "no protocol errors",
> but if both parties use the same software, the bad protocol can only come from
> the software.

Agreed.

> NFS over UDP has the feature that it works under load, even if some packets
> are dropped. I cannot confirm that property for TOTEM.

NFS is for bulk data transfer and has to deal with network saturation.
TOTEM isn't designed for this. Taking this from the first link[1]:
"The Totem single-ring protocol"
*Provides rapid detection of network partitioning and processor failure together with reconfiguration and membership services.

This property of TOTEM acts against the desired property of robustness against network
problems. I think the TOTEM configuration can be improved against
the known problems and sensitivity to datagram losses by increasing the retransmission timeout and threshold.
Doing this increases the time it takes for Corosync to detect dead nodes, though.

- -- 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards,
Noel Kuntze

GPG Key ID: 0x63EC6658
Fingerprint: 23CA BB60 2146 05E7 7278 6592 3839 298F 63EC 6658

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=hSE9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






More information about the Users mailing list