[ClusterLabs] SBD & Failed Peer

[Jorge Fábregas]

On 09/08/2015 10:13 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> Good news/bad news:
> 
> Yes, pacemaker supports complex hierarchies of multiple fencing devices,
> which it calls "fencing topology". There is a small example at
> http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1-pcs/html-single/Pacemaker_Explained/index.html#_advanced_stonith_configurations
> 
> Unfortunately, sbd is not supported in fencing topologies. Pacemaker
> hooks into sbd via dedicated internal logic, not a conventional fence
> agent, so it's treated differently. You might want to open an RFE bug
> either upstream or with your OS vendor if you want to put it on the
> radar, but sbd isn't entirely under Pacemaker's control, so I'm not sure
> how feasible it would be.


Thanks for the info Ken.  Interesting!

Best regards,
Jorge