[ClusterLabs] [ANNOUNCE] [HA] [Pacemaker] new, maintained openstack-resource-agents repository

[Adam Spiers]

[cross-posting to openstack-dev and pacemaker user lists; please
consider trimming the recipients list if your reply is not relevant to
both communities]

Hi all,

Back in June I proposed moving the well-used but no longer maintained
https://github.com/madkiss/openstack-resource-agents/ repository to
Stackforge:

  http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-June/067763.html
  https://github.com/madkiss/openstack-resource-agents/issues/22

The responses I got were more or less unanimously in favour, so I'm
simultaneously pleased and slightly embarrassed to announce that 4
months later, I've finally followed up on my proposal:

  https://launchpad.net/openstack-resource-agents
  https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-resource-agents/
  https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/projects/openstack/openstack-resource-agents
  https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/openstack-resource-agents,n,z

Since June, Stackforge has been retired, so as you can see above, this
repository lives under the 'openstack' namespace.

I volunteered to be a maintainer and there were no objections.  I sent
out an initial call for co-maintainers but noone expressed an interest
which is probably fine because the workload is likely to be quite
light.  However if you'd like to be involved please drop me a line.

I've also taken care of outstanding pull requests and bug reports
against the old repository, and providing a redirect from the old
repository's README to the new one.

Still TODO: adding this repository to the Big Tent.  I've had some
discussions with the openstack-infra team about that, since there is
not currently a suitable project team to create it under.  We might
create a new project team called "OpenStack Pacemaker" or similar, and
place it under that.  ("OpenStack HA" would be far too broad to be
able to find a single PTL.)  However there is no rush for this, and it
has been suggested that it would not be a bad thing to wait for the
"new" project to stabilise and prove its longevity before making it
official.

Cheers,
Adam

P.S. I'll be in Tokyo if anyone wants to meet there and discuss
further.