[ClusterLabs] Is STONITH resource location special?
Ferenc Wagner
wferi at niif.hu
Mon Oct 19 13:36:33 UTC 2015
Hi,
Pacemaker Explained discusses in 13.3 the special treatment of STONITH
resources. Now, I configured 6 fence_ipmilan instances in a cluster
which runs on 4 nodes currently. No STONITH resource started on the
node it can kill, even though I haven't configured location constraints
yet. Is this clever placement accidental, or is it another aspect of
the special treatment of STONITH resources? Should I configure the
usual location constraints, or are they not needed under 1.1.13?
Also, I haven't configured pcmk_host_check, so is should default to
dynamic-list, but the pcmk_host_list setting is still effective,
according to stonith_admin. I don't mind this, but it seems to
contradict the documentation. Who is right?
--
Thanks,
Feri.
More information about the Users
mailing list