[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] [meta] OK to archive users/developers lists externally?

[Ulrich Windl]

Hi!

Well from the past I found out that many people don't care and just copy
contents to their web site anyway. What I don't like is when you seem to find
three different hits in Google which turn out to be the same article (written
by yourself)...

Maybe we should point out that these articles are available for free without
nasty advertising, also ;-)

Regards,
Ulrich

>>> Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> schrieb am 18.05.2015 um 04:17 in Nachricht
<55594BB5.2030309 at alteeve.ca>:
> The more exposure, the better, in my opinion.
> 
> On 17/05/15 10:14 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> fine with me
>> 
>>> On 16 May 2015, at 7:01 am, Jan Pokorný <jpokorny at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> before proceeding, wanted to ask you, the ML admins and the
>>> subscribed, if you have any objections again making the two new lists
>>> from $SUBJ indexed/archived by (subset of) following ML sinks:
>>> - http://gmane.org/ 
>>> - https://www.mail-archive.com/ 
>>> - https://marc.info/ 
>>> - http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ 
>>>
>>> This will hopefully bring full-text search and perhaps better
>>> persistency of ML activity.
>>>
>>> If there's no clearly negative reply in a fortnight, I will go ahead.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Jan
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Developers mailing list
>> Developers at clusterlabs.org 
>> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Digimer
> Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ 
> What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
> access to education?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org 
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org 
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf 
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org