[ClusterLabs] crmd[4893]: notice: peer_update_callback: Node return implies stonith of node1 (action 34) completed

[Andrew Beekhof]

> On 11 Mar 2015, at 5:48 pm, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I was looking why node did takeover of another node and stumbled on
> this message. The sequence was
> 
> - loss of LAN connection for ~ 30 seconds
> - split brain
> - node initiated IPMI stonith
> - *BEFORE* IPMI stonith returned LAN connection was back and both
> nodes saw each other
> - and crmd assumed stonith worked
> 
> 
> Is it intentional?

Pretty much.

> Node node was actually rebooted by IPMI after this.

Not ideal but also nothing much we can do about it.