[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: pacemaker doesn't correctly handle a resource after time/date change

[Kostiantyn Ponomarenko]

So, is it considered as a bug in Pacemaker?
Buy the way, while the "failure-timeout" is set to 1 hour and with the
"cluster-recheck-interval" of 15 min, the resource is started by the
cluster sometime after 1 hour and 15 min time period.

Thank you,
Kostya

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Ulrich Windl <
Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:

> >>> Kostiantyn Ponomarenko <konstantin.ponomarenko at gmail.com> schrieb am
> 24.07.2015
> um 16:53 in Nachricht
> <CAEnTH0fPx9Zjj71gW92xordkOw1kk7kbT8xtO7M1En9w5MCyVw at mail.gmail.com>:
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Ulrich Windl <
> > Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
> >
> >> 25 years backwards?
> >
> >
> > I've tried to set time back for:
> >     2 hours;
> >     10 min.
> > The result was the same as with:
> >     # date --set="1990-01-01 01:00:00"
> >
> > Setting time to 5 min back doesn't lead to that issue - the resource is
> > restarted.
> > There is no such problem with setting time forward.
>
> I'm afraid no programmer ever took provisions for time running backwards.
> It may be as simple as that. Recently thres has been even heavy discussion
> (elsewhere) about the bad effects of inserting a leap second, realizing
> that the POSIX interface has to means of detecting a leap second...
>
> >
> > P.S.:The resource has it's monitor interval set to 30 sec.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Kostya
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list: Users at clusterlabs.org
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150729/6aea9376/attachment.html>